Homepage › Solution manuals › David A. Cox › Galois Theory › Exercise 10.1.8
Exercise 10.1.8
In the Mathematical notes we defined the field and what it means for a subfield to be Pythagorean.
- (a)
- Let be a real number. Prove that if and only if there is a sequence of fields such that , and for there are such that .
- (b)
- Prove that is the smallest Pythagorean subfield of .
Answers
Write the set of points of (identified with the Euclidean plane) constructible by a sequence of straightedge-and-dividers constructions, and the set of lines passing through two distinct such points (so constructible by straightedge-and-dividers) .
Lemma 1. If , with , then the parallel to passing through is in .
Proof. Let the symmetric point of relative to , and the symmetric point of relative to , so . Since and , lie in , and , so and is parallel to , with . So . □
Lemma 2. is a subfield of .
Proof. Using Lemma 1, we can mimic the proof of first part of Theorem 10.1.4. □
Lemma 3. Let , where . Then if and only if .
Proof.
- Suppose that . By Lemma 1, we can construct by straightedge-and-dividers constructions the lines passing through and parallel to the axis, so are constructible, and using the divider, so are the real numbers , therefore .
- Suppose that . Then , and the intersection of the lines passing through these two points and parallel to the -axis and -axis respectively lies in .
Proof. (Ex. 10.1.8)
- (a)
-
Let
be a real number.
-
Suppose that there is a sequence of fields
such that
, and for
, there are
such that
.
We prove by induction that . Since is a subfield of , . Suppose that . As , (see the Mathematical Notes), so , and the induction is done.
Therefore , and , so .
-
Conversely, suppose that
. We use induction on the number
of steps in the construction of
to prove that there is a sequence of subfields of
,
, such that
, where
.
When , we must have or , in which case contains the real and imaginary part of .
Now suppose that is constructed in steps, where the last step use the intersection of two lines . As in the proof of the Theorem 10.1.6, the coordinates of lie in the same field .
If the last step uses the divider, then their exist four points such that are collinear and . Moreover, by the induction hypothesis, the coordinates of are in .
Then , with
Let
Then . As , , and the induction is done.
In particular, if , then , where and there are such that .
- (b)
-
By the Mathematical notes, if
, then
, so
is a Pythagorean subfield of
.
Let any Pythagorean subfield of , and take any . By part (a), there exists a sequence of subfields of ,
such that , and for there are such that . As any subfield of , contains , so .
By induction, suppose that for some integer . Then , where . As is Pythagorean, , so , and the induction is done.
So , and , so . Hence , so is the smallest Pythagorean subfield of .