Exercise 10.2.2

Let p be prime. In Example 9.1.6, we showed that

Φ p 2 ( x ) = x p ( p 1 ) + x p ( p 2 ) + + x 2 p + x p + 1 .

The goal of this exercise is to prove that Φ p 2 ( x ) is irreducible over using only the Schönemann-Eisenstein criterion.

(a)
Explain how the formulas of Example 9.1.6 imply that ( x + 1 ) p 2 1 = ( ( x + 1 ) p 1 ) Φ p 2 ( x + 1 ) .

(b)
Let Φ ¯ p 2 ( x + 1 ) be the reduction of Φ p 2 ( x + 1 ) modulo p . Show that x p 2 = x p Φ ¯ p 2 ( x + 1 ) .

(c)
Show that Φ p 2 ( x + 1 ) is irreducible over by the Schönemann-Eisenstein criterion. As in the proof of Proposition 4.2.5, this will imply that the same is true for Φ p 2 ( x ) .

Answers

Proof. (Ex 10.2.2)

(a)
As in Example 9.1.6, using Proposition 9.1.5, we obtain x p 1 = Φ 1 ( x ) Φ p ( x ) and x p 2 1 = Φ 1 ( x ) Φ p ( x ) Φ p 2 ( x ) .

Thus

x p 2 1 = ( x p 1 ) Φ p 2 ( x ) .

The substitution x x + 1 gives

( x + 1 ) p 2 1 = ( ( x + 1 ) p 1 ) Φ p 2 ( x + 1 ) .

(b)
We know that p ( p k ) , 1 k p 1 , so ( x + 1 ) p x p + 1 ( mod p )

Therefore

( x + 1 ) p 2 = [ ( x + 1 ) p ] p ( x p + 1 ) p x p 2 + 1 ( mod p ) .

The reduction modulo p of the equality proved in part (a) gives

x p 2 = x p Φ ¯ p 2 ( x + 1 ) .

(c)
As Φ ¯ p 2 ( x + 1 ) = x p 2 p , all the the coefficients of Φ p 2 ( x + 1 ) are divisible by p , except the leading coefficient. Moreover Φ p 2 ( 1 ) = p , so the constant coefficient of Φ p 2 ( x + 1 ) is not divisible by p 2 , so the Schönemann-Eisenstein criterion shows that Φ p 2 ( x + 1 ) is irreducible over , and this is equivalent to the irreducibility of Φ p 2 ( x ) over .
User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments