Exercise 13.1.9

As in Example 13.1.3, let f = x 4 + a x 3 + b x 2 + ax + 1 F [ x ] , and let α be a root of f in some splitting field of f over F . Show that α 1 is also a root of f , and then use (13.5) to conclude that 2 is a root of the resolvent 𝜃 f ( y ) .

Answers

Proof. If α is a root of f in some splitting field L of F , then α 4 + a α 3 + b α 2 + + 1 = 0 . If we divide by α 4 , we obtain 1 + a α 1 + b α 2 + a α 3 + α 4 , so f ( α 1 ) = 0 . Note that

x 4 + a x 3 + b x 2 + ax + 1 = x 2 [ ( x 2 + 1 x 2 ) + a ( x + 1 x ) + b ] = x 2 [ ( x + 1 x ) 2 + a ( x + 1 x ) + b 2 ]

As 0 is not a root of f , the roots of f are the roots of z = x + 1 x , where z is a root of z 2 + az + b 2 , so the roots of f are the roots of the two polynomials

x 2 z 1 x + 1 , x 2 z 2 x + 1 ,

where z 1 , z 2 are the roots in L of

z 2 + az + b 2 .

If we relabel the roots so that α 1 , α 2 are the roots of x 2 z 1 x + 1 , and α 3 , α 4 the roots of x 2 z 2 x + 1 , then α 1 α 2 = 1 , α 3 α 4 = 1 , therefore β 1 = α 1 α 2 + α 3 α 4 = 2 is a root of the Ferrari resolvent 𝜃 f ( y ) . □

User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments