Exercise 13.2.18

This exercise is concerned with the polynomials (13.28). As in the Historical Notes, we will assume that they lie in [ x ] and are irreducible.

(a)
Show that Q 2 P 5 + ( P Q ) Q 2 P 5 2 is a root of x 5 5 P x 2 5 Qx Q 2 P P 3 Q .
(b)
Prove that the Galois group of x 5 5 P x 2 5 Qx Q 2 P P 3 Q over is isomorphic to AGL ( 1 , 𝔽 5 ) .
(c)
Prove that over ( 5 ) , the first two polynomials of (13.28) have cyclic Galois group while the third has Galois group isomorphic to AGL ( 1 , 𝔽 5 ) A 5 .

Answers

Proof.

(a)
As in Cardan’s method, we substitute u + v to x in f ( x ) = x 5 5 P x 2 5 Qx Q 2 P P 3 Q .

We obtain

f ( u + v ) = u 5 + 5 u 4 v + 10 u 3 v 2 + 10 u 2 v 3 + 5 u v 4 + v 5 5 P u 2 10 Puv 5 P v 2 5 Qu 5 Qv Q 2 P P 3 Q = ( u 5 + v 5 Q 2 P P 3 Q ) + 5 ( u 3 v + u 2 v 2 + u v 3 Pu Pv Q ) ( u + v ) .

Then we verify that u = Q 2 P 5 = P 1 5 Q 2 5 , v = ( P Q ) Q 2 P 5 2 = P 3 5 Q 1 5 is a solution of the system

0 = u 5 + v 5 Q 2 P P 3 Q , 0 = u 3 v + u 2 v 2 + u v 3 Pu Pv Q .

Indeed

u 5 + v 5 Q 2 P P 3 Q = Q 2 P + P 3 Q Q 2 P P 3 Q = 0 ,

and, since P = u v 2 , Q = u 3 v ,

u 3 v + u 2 v 2 + u v 3 Pu Pv Q = u 3 v + u 2 v 2 + u v 3 u 2 v 2 u v 3 u 3 v = 0 .

Therefore

u + v = Q 2 P 5 + ( P Q ) Q 2 P 5 2

is a root of x 5 5 P x 2 5 Qx Q 2 P P 3 Q . If we replace Q 5 by another fifth root ζ k Q 5 , k = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , (where ζ = e 2 5 ), in the equation

0 = u 3 v + u 2 v 2 + u v 3 Pu Pv Q , where  u = P 5 1 Q 5 2 , v = P 5 3 Q 5 1 ,

then u is replaced by ζ 2 k u , and v is replace by ζ 4 k v , therefore ζ 2 k u , ζ 4 k v is a solution of the preceding system, so ζ 2 k u + ζ 4 k v is also a root of f . So

u + v , ζ 2 u + ζ 4 v , ζ 4 u + ζ 3 v , ζu + ζ 2 v , ζ 3 u + ζv ,

are roots of f , where

u = Q 2 P 5 , v = ( P Q ) Q 2 P 5 2 .

These roots are the five roots of f , as proved in the following expansion:

( x ( u + v ) ) ( x ( ζ 2 u + ζ 4 v ) ) ( x ( ζ 4 u + ζ 3 v ) ) ( x ( ζu + ζ 2 v ) ) ( x ( ζ 3 u + ζv ) ) = x 5 5 u v 2 x 2 5 u 3 vx u 5 v 5 .

Since

P = u v 2 , Q = u 3 v ,

we obtain

u 5 = Q 2 P , v 5 = P 3 Q ,

so

f = x 5 5 P x 2 5 Qx Q 2 P P 3 Q = ( x ( u + v ) ) ( x ( ζ 2 u + ζ 4 v ) ) ( x ( ζ 4 u + ζ 3 v ) ) ( x ( ζu + ζ 2 v ) ) ( x ( ζ 3 u + ζv ) )

Therefore the roots of f are ζ 2 k u + ζ 4 k v , k = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 .

This was perhaps the Euler’s starting point.

(b)
We obtain the discriminant of f with
     R.<P,Q,u,v,e,x> = QQ[]
     f = x^5 - 5*P*x^2 - 5*Q*x -e;
     Delta = f.discriminant(x).subs(e = Q^2/P + P^3/Q).factor()
     Delta

( 3125 ) Q 4 P 4 ( P 8 11 P 4 Q 3 + Q 6 ) 2

so

Δ = 5 5 ( P 8 + 11 P 4 Q 3 Q 6 ) 2 P 4 Q 4 .

Thus Δ is not a square in .

Using the resolvent() function of Exercise 14, we obtain the sextic resolvent:

     K.<P,Q,e> = QQ[]
     S.<x> =PolynomialRing(K, order = ’degrevlex’)
     f = x^5 - 5*P*x^2 - 5*Q*x -e
     theta = resolvent(f)[0]; theta.subs(e = Q^2/P + P^3/Q)

𝜃 f ( y ) = ( 100 Q y 2 + y 3 + 2000 ( 3 Q 2 ( P 4 + Q 3 ) Q ) y ) 2 1024 Δ ( f ) y = ( y 3 + 100 Q y 2 2000 ( P 4 Q 2 Q 2 ) y ) 2 1024 Δ ( f ) y ,

which has root 0 ( b 6 = 0 ). By Section 13.2, the Galois group of f is AGL ( 1 , 𝔽 5 ) up to conjugacy.

(c)
By Exercise 13, we know that the Galois group of x 5 2 over ( 5 ) is AGL ( 1 , 𝔽 5 ) A 5 which is not cyclic, so there is a misprint in the sentence.
The polynomial f = x 5 D ( 5 ) [ x ] , D , is irreducible over by hypothesis. Let α be a root of f . Since [ ( α ) : ] = 5 and [ ( 5 ) : ] = 2 , we obtain that 10 = 2 × 5 divides [ ( 5 , α ) : ] , where [ ( 5 , α ) : ] 10 . Therefore 10 = [ ( 5 , α ) : ] = [ ( 5 , α ) : ( 5 ) ] [ ( 5 ) : ] ,

so [ ( 5 , α ) : ( 5 ) ] = 5 . If p is the minimal polynomial of α over ( 5 ) , then deg ( p ) = [ ( 5 , α ) : ( 5 ) ] = 5 , and p divides f , therefore p = f , and we have proved that f is irreducible over ( 5 ) .

Moreover

Δ ( f ) = 5 5 D 4 = ( 5 2 D 2 5 ) 2

is a square in ( 5 ) , and 0 ( 5 ) is a root of the resolvent

Θ f ( y ) = y 6 Δ ( f ) y .

If α = D 5 , and ζ = ζ 5 , then

x 5 D = ( x α ) ( x ζα ) ( x ζ 2 α ) ( x ζ 3 α ) ( x ζ 4 α ) .

But ζα , so ζα ( 5 ) ( α ) . f doesn’t split completely over F ( α ) , where α is a root of f . By Theorem 13.2.6 and the table 13.2.C,

Gal ( L ( 5 ) ) AGL ( 1 , 𝔽 5 ) A 5 ,

where L is the splitting field of x 5 D .

Now f = x 5 5 P x 2 5 Qx Q 2 P P 3 Q , and f is assumed irreducible over .

With the same proof as in the first bullet, f remains irreducible over ( 5 ) .

By part (b),

Δ = 5 5 ( P 8 + 11 P 4 Q 3 Q 6 ) 2 P 4 Q 4

is a square in ( 5 ) , and

𝜃 f ( y ) = ( y 3 + 100 Q y 2 2000 ( P 4 Q 2 Q 2 ) y ) 2 1024 Δ ( f ) y ,

has root 0 ( 5 ) . By part (a),

f = x 5 5 P x 2 5 Qx Q 2 P P 3 Q = ( x ( u + v ) ) ( x ( ζ 2 u + ζ 4 v ) ) ( x ( ζ 4 u + ζ 3 v ) ) ( x ( ζu + ζ 2 v ) ) ( x ( ζ 3 u + ζv ) )

We prove that α 2 = ζ 2 u + ζ 4 v is not real. If α 2 , then α 2 = α 2 ¯ , so ( ζ 2 ζ 3 ) u + ( ζ 4 ζ ) v = 0 .

Then, using 5 = ζ ζ 2 ζ 3 + ζ 4 and ζ 2 + ζ 3 = 1 + 5 2 ,

v u = ζ 2 ζ 3 ζ ζ 4 = ζ ζ 2 1 ζ 3 = ( ζ ζ 2 ) ( 1 ζ 2 ) ( 1 ζ 3 ) ( 1 ζ 2 ) = ζ ζ 2 ζ 3 + ζ 4 1 ( ζ 2 + ζ 3 ) + ζ 5 = 5 2 + 1 + 5 2 = 5 1 2

Since v u = P Q Q 2 P 5 , we would have Q 2 P 5 ( 5 ) , and then the root α 1 = u + v ( 5 ) , in contradiction with the irreducibility of f over ( 5 ) .

So α 2 is not in the field ( 5 ) ( α 1 ) , and f doesn’t split completely over ( 5 ) ( α 1 ) .

By the table 13.2.C, Gal ( L ( 5 ) AGL ( 1 , 𝔽 5 ) A 5 .

The third Euler’s polynomial is f = x 5 5 P x 3 + 5 P 2 x D .

If p = 5 P , q = D , we obtain f = x 5 + p x 3 + 1 5 p 2 x + q , which is Example 13.2.10. We know from this example and from Exercise 14 that the Galois group of f over is AGL ( 1 , 𝔽 5 ) .

With the same proof as in the first bullet, f remains irreducible over ( 5 ) .

By Exercise 14,

Δ ( f ) = 1 5 5 ( 4 p 5 + 3125 q 2 ) 2

is a square in the field ( 5 ) , and

𝜃 f ( y ) = ( y 3 7 p 2 y 2 + 11 p 4 y + 3 25 p 6 + 4000 p q 2 ) 2 2 10 Δ ( f ) y

has the root 5 p 2 .

It remains to know if f splits completely over ( 5 ) .

Note that

f ( u + v ) = u 5 + v 5 + q + ( u 2 + uv + v 2 + p 5 ) ( 5 uv + p ) ( u + v ) .

Therefore if uv = p 5 , f ( u + v ) = u 5 + v 5 + q , so we find (see Exercise 14) that

f ( z p 5 z ) = z 5 p 5 5 5 z 5 + q .

So u + v is a root of f if

{ u 5 + v 5 = q = D uv = p 5 = P

Therefore u 5 , v 5 are the roots of x 2 + qx ( p 5 ) 5 and satisfy uv = p 5 . If u + v is a root, so is ζ k u + ζ k v , k (where ζ = ζ 5 = e 2 5 ).

Conversely

( x u v ) ( x ζu ζ 1 v ) ( x ζ 2 u ζ 2 v ) ( x ζ 3 u ζ 3 v ) ( x ζ 4 u ζ 4 v ) = x 5 5 uv x 3 + 5 u 2 v 2 x u 5 v 5 = x 5 5 P x 3 + 5 P 2 x D

So the roots of f = x 5 5 P x 3 + 5 P 2 x D = x 5 + p x 3 + 1 5 p 2 x + q are

u + v , ζu + ζ 1 v , ζ 2 u + ζ 2 v , ζ 3 u + ζ 3 v , ζ 4 u + ζ 4 v ,

where ( u , v ) is a solution of the system

uv = P = p 5 , u 5 + v 5 = D = q ,

so

u = q 2 + ( q 2 ) 2 + ( p 5 ) 5 5 , v = q 2 ( q 2 ) 2 + ( p 5 ) 5 5 ,

(where we choose the real roots, so u , v ).

We obtained the factorization of f :

f = x 5 5 P x 3 + 5 P 2 x D = ( x u v ) ( x ζu ζ 1 v ) ( x ζ 2 u ζ 2 v ) ( x ζ 3 u ζ 3 v ) ( x ζ 4 u ζ 4 v )

If the root α 2 = ζu + ζ 1 v is real, then u = v , so ( q 2 ) 2 + ( p 5 ) 5 = 0 , and this imply Δ ( f ) = 0 , in contradiction with the assumed separability of f .

Therefore α 2 ( 5 ) ( α 1 ) , where α 1 = u + v is a root of f , so f doesn’t split completely over ( 5 ) ( α 1 ) .

Gal ( L ( 5 ) ) is isomorphic to AGL ( 1 , 𝔽 5 ) A 5 .

We obtained the same Galois group for the 3 Euler’s polynomials of (13.28).

User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments