In the context of the proof of part (b) of Theorem 13.2.6,
. Let
and
, where
and
By definition,
Since
and
, there exists
such that
maps to
for every
, so
Then, for all
,
So
By assumption, some
is in
, therefore
, and
for all
. We obtain the identity
Multiplying this out, we obtain
so
Therefore, since
has characteristic
,
so
The precedent identity becomes
Hence
. Yet
has characteristic
, and
, since
is separable. This contradiction completes the proof of the theorem.
We prove part (c) of Theorem 13.2.6.
Suppose that
is conjugate to
. Let
be the splitting field of
. We choose the numbering of the roots such that
, where
corresponds to
.
, so the Tower Theorem implies that
divides 5.
Since
is irreducible,
, so
,
and
. Therefore
, and so
splits completely over
.
Conversely suppose that
splits completely over
. Then
, so the splitting field of
is
. Therefore
is prime, so
is cyclic.
is cyclic of order 5, so
, where
is a permutation of order 5.
is a product of disjoint cycles whose order is the least common multiple of the length of the cycles, so
is a
-cycle.
, where
is defined by
.
is conjugate to
.