Exercise 13.3.12

Prove that (13.31) from Example 13.3.4 is an example of a relative resolvent in the sense of Exercise 5.

Proof. Suppose f = x 4 c 1 x 3 + c 2 x 2 c 3 x + c 4 F [ x ] is separable and irreducible. Let H = ( 1324 ) , ( 12 ) , G = ( 1324 ) ) H and φ = Δ ( x 1 + x 2 x 3 x 4 ) . By Exercise 4, G is the symmetry group of φ . Since ( 12 ) φ = φ , H φ = { φ , φ } is the orbit of φ under the action of H . Then

Θ f H ( y ) = ( y φ ( α 1 , . . . , α 4 ) ) ( y + φ ( α 1 , . . . , α 4 ) ) = ( y 2 φ 2 ( α 1 , . . . , α 4 ) ) ,

where φ 2 ( α 1 , . . . , α 4 ) = Δ ( f ) ( 4 β 1 + c 1 2 4 c 2 ) , β 1 = α 1 α 2 + α 3 α 4 . By the assumption of Example 13.3.4, β 1 F , therefore Θ f H ( y ) F [ y ] and it is the relative resolvent in the sense of Exercise 5.

Since G f H , depending on whether Θ f H ( y ) is reducible or not in F , the conclusion about whether G f = ( 1324 ) ) or G f = ( 1324 ) , ( 12 ) can be done. □

Answers

User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments