Exercise 14.2.8

The goal of this exercise is to relate Definition 14.2.2 to Galois’s definition of not primitive. Let f F [ x ] be monic, separable, and irreducible with splitting field F L . Also assume that f is imprimitive with blocks of roots given by R 1 , , R m , where each block has n elements (thus deg ( f ) = mn ). Let f i be the monic polynomial whose roots are the elements of R i , and let K L be the fixed field of

{ σ Gal ( L F ) | σ ( R i ) = R i  for all  i } .

(a)
Show that f = i = 1 m f i and that f i K [ x ] for all i .
(b)
In Galois’ definition, K is obtained by adjoining the roots of a separable polynomial of degree m . In modern terms, Galois wants F K to be Galois extension such that Gal ( K F ) (*) is isomorphic to a subgroup of S m . Prove that the field K defined in part (a) has these properties. See Exercise 14 for some examples.

[(*) misprint in Cox.]

Answers

Proof.

(a)
By Definition 14.2.2, R = R 1 R m (disjoint union) is the set of roots of f . Since f is separable, by definition of f i , f = α R ( x α ) = i = 1 m α R i ( x α ) = i = 1 m f i .

Let

G = { σ Gal ( L F ) | i [[ 1 , m ]] , σ ( R i ) = R i } .

If G i = { σ Gal ( L F ) | σ ( R i ) = R i } for i = 1 , , n , then G = i = 1 m G i .

Each G i is a subgroup of Gal ( L F ) : e ( R i ) = R i , and if σ , τ R i , then ( στ ) ( R i ) = σ ( R i ) = R i and R i = σ 1 ( R i ) . Therefore G = i = 1 m G i is a subgroup of Gal ( L F ) .

Let K = L G be the fixed field of G . By the Galois correspondence, G = Gal ( L K ) .

If σ G i , since σ ( R i ) = R i , where le restriction of σ to R i is bijective, then

σ f i = α R i ( x σ ( α ) ) = β R i ( x β ) = f i , ( β = σ ( α ) ) .

Therefore, if σ G = i = 1 m G i , then for all i { 1 , , m } , σ f i = f i . The coefficients of f i are in the fixed field K of G , so that

f i K [ x ] , i = 1 , , m .

To give a first example, f = x 4 2 is imprimitive with blocks

R 1 = { 2 4 , 2 4 } , R 2 = { i 2 4 , i 2 4 } .

If τ , σ are defined by τ ( 2 4 ) = 2 4 , τ ( i ) = i , and σ ( 2 4 ) = i 2 4 , σ ( i ) = i , then

Gal ( L F ) = { e , σ , σ 2 , σ 3 , τ , στ , σ 2 τ , σ 3 τ } D 8 .

Here G = G 1 = G 2 = { e , σ 2 , τ , σ 2 τ } , and K = L G = ( 2 ) (see Ex. 6.3.2 and Ex. 7.3.3).

We verify f 1 ( x ) = x 2 2 , f 2 ( x ) = x 2 + 2 K [ x ] .

(b)
We prove that G is a normal subgroup of Gal ( L F ) .

Let λ Gal ( L F ) , and σ G . Since f is imprimitive, λ Gal ( L F ) permutes the blocks R i : there exists τ S m such that

λ ( R i ) = R τ ( i ) , i = 1 , , m .

Let j be any fixed index in { 1 , , m } , and i such that τ ( i ) = j . Since σ G G i , σ ( R i ) = R i , thus

( λσ λ 1 ) ( R j ) = ( λσ ) ( R i ) = λ ( R i ) = R j .

Since this is true for all j { 1 , , m } , λσ λ 1 G . This proves that G is a normal subgroup of Gal ( L F ) . Therefore F K is a Galois extension (Theorem 7.2.5).

Now we prove that Gal ( K F ) is isomorphic to a subgroup of S m .

Since f is imprimitive with blocks of roots given by R 1 , , R m , for each σ Gal ( L F ) , there exists τ S m such that σ ( R i ) = R τ ( i ) , i = 1 , , m . Consider the map φ sending σ to τ :

φ { Gal ( L F ) S m σ τ : i [[ 1 , m ]] , σ ( R i ) = R τ ( i ) .

Then , for all σ Gal ( L F ) ,

φ ( σ ) = ( ) i [[ 1 , m ]] , σ ( R i ) = R i σ G .

Therefore, ker ( φ ) = G , and by the Galois correspondence (see part (a)) G = Gal ( L K ) , so that

ker ( φ ) = G = Gal ( L K ) .

Then, by Theorem 7.3.2, since K is Galois over F ,

S m im ( φ ) Gal ( L F ) ker ( φ ) = Gal ( L F ) Gal ( L K ) Gal ( K F ) .

Therefore Gal ( K F ) is isomorphic to the subgroup im ( φ ) of S m .

User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments