Exercise 14.3.18

Here are some observations related to Exercise 5.

(a)
Give an example to show that Exercise 5 is false if we drop the assumption that A and B are non-Abelian.
(b)
Let A 1 , , A r be non-Abelian simple groups. Determine all nontrivial normal subgroups of A 1 × × A r .

Answers

Proof. (a) Consider the group G = 3 × 3 = A × B , where A = B = 3 is simple. This is the additive group of the vector space 𝔽 3 2 . If v = ( 1 , 2 ) (for instance), the vectorial line

N = 𝔽 3 v = { ( 0 , 0 ) , ( 1 , 2 ) , ( 2 , 1 ) }

is a subspace of 𝔽 3 2 , therefore a subgroup of G . Moreover N is normal and not trivial, and N { 0 } × B , N A × { 0 } . This counterexample shows that Exercise 5 is false if we drop the assumption that A and B are non-Abelian. (b) We will follow the steps of Exercise 5. First, note that the subsets H 1 × H r G , where H i = { e A i } or H i = A i for all i = 1 , r , are normal subgroups of G = A 1 × × A r :

Take h = ( h 1 , , h r ) N = H 1 × H r , and a = ( a 1 , , a r ) G , then ah a 1 = ( a 1 h 1 a 1 1 , , a r h r a r 1 ) . If H i = { e A i } , then a i h i a i 1 = a i a i 1 = e A i H i , and if H i = A i , then a i h i a i 1 H i , thus ah a 1 N .

We will call these subgroups standard normal subgroups. To prove that these standard subgroups are the only normal subgroups of G , we use induction on r . The case r = 2 is done is Exercise 5.

For simplicity, we write e for the identity of each group H i .

Now suppose that for any k < r , and for any k -tuple ( A 1 , , A k ) of non-Abelian simple groups, the only normal subgroups of A = A 1 × × A k are H 1 × H k , where H i = { e } or H i = A i for all i = 1 , k .

Now let A 1 , , A r be non-Abelian simple groups, and let N be a normal subgroup of A 1 × × A r . Consider first the case where, for some i { 1 , , n } ,

N A 1 × × A i 1 × { e } × A i + 1 × A r A 1 × × A i 1 × A i + 1 × A r , where the isomorphism is the map ( a 1 , , a i 1 , e , a i + 1 , , a r ) ( a 1 , , a i 1 , a i + 1 , , a r ) . This isomorphism sends N on a normal subgroup N .

A 1 × A i 1 × A i + 1 × A r is a direct product of r 1 simple non-Abelian subgroups, thus we can apply the induction hypothesis: its only normal subgroups are standard subgroups, thus N is standard. This implies, via the isomorphism, that

N = H 1 × H i 1 × { e } × H i + 1 × × H r ,  where  H j = { e }  or  H j = A j  for all  j .

Therefore N is standard in this case. In the remaining case, N A 1 × × A i 1 × { e } × A i + 1 × × A r for all i = 1 , , r . We want to prove that N is the whole group G . First, we prove that there is some n = ( n 1 , , n r ) N such that a i e for all i , 1 i r .

Fix some i { 1 , , r } . Since N A 1 × × A i 1 × { e } × A i + 1 × × A r , there exists some n i = ( a 1 , , a i , , a r ) N such that a i e .

Since A i is non-Abelian and simple, the centers Z i of A i are different from A i , and Z i is normal in the simple group A i , thus Z i = { e } . Using a i e , this shows that there is some c A i such that a i c c a i . Now take a = ( e , , e , c , e , , e ) G . Since N is normal, n i ( a n i 1 a 1 ) N , and

n i a n i 1 a 1 = ( a 1 , , a i , , a r ) ( e , , c , , e ) ( a 1 1 , , a i 1 , , a r 1 ) ( e , , c 1 , , e ) = ( e , , a i c a i 1 c 1 , , e ) ,

thus n i a n i 1 a 1 = ( e , , n i , , e ) N , where n i = a i c a i 1 c 1 e . Since we can find such n i e for each index i ,

n = ( n 1 , , n r ) = ( n 1 , e , , e ) ( e , n 2 , , e ) ( e , , n r ) N ,  where  n 1 e , , n r e .

Write b = n r . N is normal in G , thus, for any a = ( a 1 , , a r 1 , e ) A 1 × × A r ,

n ( a n 1 a 1 ) = ( n 1 , , n r 1 , b ) ( a 1 , , a r 1 , e ) ( n 1 1 , , n r 1 1 , b 1 ) ( a 1 1 , , a r 1 1 , e ) = ( n 1 a 1 n 1 1 a 1 1 , , n r 1 a r 1 n r 1 1 a r 1 1 , e ) N

Since Z i = { e } , we can find ( a 1 , , a r 1 , e ) A such that n i a i n i 1 a i 1 e for every i , 1 i r 1 .

Write for simplicity A = A 1 × × A r 1 , B = A r , and e A = ( e , , e ) the identity of A .

By the induction hypothesis, N ( A × { e } ) is a direct product of trivial subgroups H i A i :

N ( A × { e } ) = H 1 × × H r 1 × { e } , H i = { e }  or  H i = A i , i = 1 , , r 1 ,

Since

na n 1 a 1 = ( n 1 a 1 n 1 1 a 1 1 , , n r 1 a r 1 n r 1 1 a r 1 1 , e ) N ( A × { e } ) = H 1 × × H r 1 × { e } ,

every H i contains an element n i a i n i 1 a i 1 e , thus H i = A i for all i , 1 i r 1 . This proves that

N ( A × { e } ) = A × { e } ,

thus A 1 × × A r 1 × { e } N .

With the same reasoning, { e } × A 2 × × A r N . If a = ( a 1 , , a r ) is any element of A 1 × × A r , then

a = ( a 1 , , a r 1 , e ) ( e , , e , a r ) ,

where ( a 1 , , a r 1 , e ) A 1 × A r 1 × { e } N , and ( e , , e , a r ) { e } × A 2 × × A r N . Therefore a N .

This proves N = A × B = A 1 × × A r × A r + 1 : for every normal subgroup N of G such that there is some n = ( n 1 , , n r ) N where n i e for all i , N is the whole group G . In this case, N is also standard, and the induction is done.

To conclude, if A 1 , , A r are non-Abelian simple groups, the only normal subgroups of A 1 × × A r are the subgroups

N = H 1 × × H r ,  where  H i = { e A i }  or  H i = A i  for all  i { 1 , , r } .

User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments