Homepage › Solution manuals › David A. Cox › Galois Theory › Exercise 14.3.6
Exercise 14.3.6
Let be a minimal normal subgroup, where is normal in a larger group . Given , we set .
- (a)
- Prove that is isomorphic to and is a minimal normal subgroup of .
- (b)
- Fix and consider . By Exercise 7, we know that is a subgroup of . Assume that for all . Prove that is normal in .
- (c)
-
Use the following idea to complete the proof of Proposition 14.3.10. Let
be the set of all subgroups of
of the form
such that the map
defines an isomorphism
Note that . Then pick an element of of maximal order.
Answers
Proof. (a) Consider
For all , , thus is a group homomorphism.
Moreover, , so that is bijective: is a group automorphism.
Since is normal subgroup of , is also a normal subgroup of .
Now take a non trivial subgroup of . Reasoning by contradiction assume that is normal in . Then is a non trivial subgroup of . Since is normal in , and is an automorphism of , is normal in . This contradicts the fact that is a minimal normal subgroup of . This contradiction proves that is not normal in . We can conclude that is a minimal normal subgroup of . (b) Let be any element of . The hypothesis gives the inclusions and , therefore, since is a subgroup,
This proves that is a normal subgroup of . (c) Let be the set of all subgroups of of the form such that the map defines an isomorphism
Note that . Then pick an element of of maximal order. Then
If , then we are done. Assume now that .
If for all , then is normal in :
for all , , thus
Since , and ( ), this is impossible by the minimality of . Hence there is such that .
We don’t know if is normal in , but is normal in , since all are normal in (see Exercise 7(a)). Hence is a normal subgroup in , and lies in the minimal normal subgroup of . Since , , therefore . By Exercise 7, this proves that the map defines an isomorphism
But , thus , and this contradicts the maximality of . This contradiction proves that , so that
□