Exercise 15.3.5

A useful observation is that an identity for φ proved over automatically becomes an identity over .

(a)
Prove this carefully, using results from complex analysis such as [13,6.1.1]
(b)
Explain why φ 2 ( z ) = 1 φ 4 ( z ) holds for all z Ω .

Answers

Proof. (a) We recall the Principle of Analytic Continuation (or Identity Theorem), given in [13,6.1.1] in some larger context:

“ Let f , g be analytic in a region (connected open set) Ω . Suppose that there is some a Ω , and a sequence ( z n ) n ( Ω { a } ) of points of Ω distinct of a converging to a Ω , such that f ( z n ) = g ( z n ) for all n = { 0 , 1 , 2 , } . Then f ( z ) = g ( z ) for all z Ω .”

Here Ω = { z z ( m + in ) ϖ 2 , m n 1 ( mod 2 ) } . Then Ω is open, and path-connected, thus is connected. Suppose that f , g are analytic on Ω , and f ( x ) = g ( x ) for all x . Since any point a of is a limit of some sequence ( z n ) n (for instance z n = a + 1 n + 1 , n = { 0 , 1 , 2 , } ), where z n a for all n . Since z n for all n , f ( z n ) = g ( z n ) . The Principle of Analytic Continuation shows that f ( z ) = g ( z ) for all z Ω . (b) If we define f , g : Ω by f ( z ) = φ 2 ( z ) , g ( z ) = 1 φ 4 ( z ) for all z Ω , then f , g are analytic and f ( x ) = g ( x ) for all x by Section 15.2. Then part (b) shows that f ( z ) = g ( z ) for all z Ω , thus

φ 2 ( z ) = 1 φ 4 ( z ) , z Ω .

User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments