Exercise 15.4.12

Let β [ i ] be prime, and let f = a 0 u d + a 1 u d 1 + + a d [ i ] [ u ] . Prove the Schönemann-Eisenstein criterion over [ i ] , which states that if β a 0 , β a 1 , , β a d , and β 2 a d , then f is irreducible over ( i ) .

Answers

Proof. Following the similar proof of Theorem 4.2.3 and Corollary 4.2.1, we reason by contradiction. Suppose that f is not irreducible over ( i ) . Then f = vw where v , w ( i ) [ u ] have degrees less than d = deg ( f ) . By Gauss’ s Lemma over [ i ] , which holds by Theorem A.5.8 because [ i ] is a UFD, with quotient field ( i ) , there is δ ( i ) such that g = δv , h = δ 1 w are in [ i ] [ u ] . Then

f = gh , g , h [ i ] [ u ] .

Now consider the ring homomorphism

π { [ i ] [ u ] ( [ i ] βℤ [ i ] ) [ u ] q = b m u m + + b 0 q ¯ = [ b m ] u m + + [ b 0 ] ,

where [ b ] = b + βℤ [ i ] [ i ] βℤ [ i ] is the coset of b [ i ] modulo the ideal βℤ [ i ] .

Then f = gh implies that [ a 0 ] u d = g ¯ h ¯ , since β a 1 , , β a d . However, β being prime, [ i ] βℤ [ i ] = 𝔽 N ( β ) is a field, which means that unique factorization holds in 𝔽 N ( β ) [ u ] . Since β a 0 , it follows that g ¯ = [ a ] u r and h ¯ = [ b ] u s , where [ a ] [ b ] = [ a 0 ] and r + s = d .

If r = 0 , then g ¯ = [ a ] and deg ( g ) > 0 would imply that the leading term of g is divisible by β . Then f = gh would imply that the same is true for the leading term a 0 of f . Thus β a 0 implies that r > 0 , and s > 0 follows similarly.

But then g ¯ = [ a ] u r for r > 0 implies that β divides the constant term of g , and the same is true for the constant term of h , since s > 0 . Since the constant term a d of f is the product of the constant terms of g and h , it follows that β 2 a d . This contradicts β 2 a d and completes the proof. □

User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments