Exercise 4.1.8

If a polynomial is irreducible over a field F , it may or may not remain irreducible over a large field. Here are examples of both types of behavior.

(a)
Prove that x 2 3 is irreducible over ( 2 ) .
(b)
In Example 4.1.7, we showed that x 4 10 x 2 + 1 is irreducible over (it is the minimal polynomial of α = 2 + 3 ). Show that x 4 10 x 2 + 1 is not irreducible over ( 3 ) .

Answers

Proof.

(a)
x 2 3 is irreducible over . We show that it remains irreducible over [ 2 ] .

Suppose on the contrary that f is reducible over F : f = x 2 3 = uv , uv [ 2 ] [ x ] , where u , v are nonconstant polynomials. Then deg ( u ) 1 , deg ( v ) 1 , and as deg ( u ) + deg ( v ) = deg ( f ) = 2 , deg ( u ) = deg ( v ) = 1 ,

u = ax + b , a , b [ 2 ] , a 0 .

Then α = b a [ 2 ] is a root of u , thus is a root of f = x 2 3 . Since 2 2 n = 2 n and 2 2 n + 1 = 2 n 2 , every element of [ 2 ] is of the form c + d 2 , c , d .

We should have α = c + d 2 = ± 3 . Then

α 2 = c 2 + 2 d 2 + 2 cd 2 = 3 .

If cd 0 , 2 = ( c 2 + 2 d 2 3 ) ( 2 cd ) , in contradiction with the irrationality of 2 . Thus c = 0 or d = 0 .

d = 0 gives 3 = ± c : this is in contradiction with the irrationality of 3 .

c = 0 implies 3 2 = ± d . But then 3 2 = p q , ( p , q ) × , p q = 1 .

3 q 2 = 2 p 2 , q 2 2 p 2 and q 2 p 2 = 1 . By Gauss Lemma, q 2 2 , q , hence q = 1 , 3 = 2 p 2 , thus 3 is even: this is absurd.

Conclusion: x 2 3 is irreducible [ 2 ] .

(b)
f = [ ( x 2 3 ) ( x + 2 3 ) ] [ ( x 2 + 3 ) ( x + 2 + 3 ) ] = [ ( x 3 ) 2 2 ] [ ( x + 3 ) 2 2 ] = ( x 2 2 3 x + 1 ) ( x 2 2 3 x + 1 ) = ( x 2 + 1 ) 2 ( 2 3 x ) 2 = x 4 10 x 2 + 1

The equality f = x 4 10 x 2 + 1 = ( x 2 2 3 x + 1 ) ( x 2 2 3 x + 1 ) show that f is not irreducible over [ 3 ] .

Factorisation with Sage:

     K = NumberField(x^2-3, ’a’);L.<X> = PolynomialRing(K)
     p = X^4-10*X^2+1
     factor(p)

( X 2 2 aX + 1 ) . ( X 2 + 2 aX + 1 ) .

User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments