Homepage › Solution manuals › David A. Cox › Galois Theory › Exercise 6.3.3
Exercise 6.3.3
In the terminology of Exercise 2, is isomorphic to which known group? Explain your reasoning in detail.
Answers
Proof. We have already proved (Ex. 5.1.13) that is irreducible over . is so the minimal polynomial of over , thus .
As is irreducible over , , therefore
Moreover, has no real root, a fortiori has no root in . As , is irreducible over , is the minimal polynomial of over , thus , and by the Tower Theorem, and the equality ,
is the splitting field of over , and is separable. By theorem 6.2.1, we obtain
If , . As , all of these possibilities occur: there exist 8 -automorphisms of satisfying these equalities. As , is uniquely determined by the images of these 3 elements.
In particular, there exist defined by
and give distinct images to , thus
Therefore
Note that since they give the same images to . Similarly and . Thus is abelian, generated by 3 elements of order 2, with . Therefore is the direct sum of the 3 subgroups , of degree 2 :
Some instructions Sage and Gap to verify these results :
f=(x-i-sqrt(2)-sqrt(3))*(x-i-sqrt(2)+sqrt(3))*(x-i+sqrt(2)-sqrt(3)) *(x-i+sqrt(2)+sqrt(3))*(x+i-sqrt(2)-sqrt(3))*(x+i-sqrt(2)+sqrt(3)) *(x+i+sqrt(2)-sqrt(3))*(x+i+sqrt(2)+sqrt(3));f
g=f.expand();g
g.factor()
x=polygen(QQ,’x’) K.<z> = NumberField(x^8-16*x^6+88*x^4+192*x^2+144) G = K.galois_group();G
With Gap :
G:=Group((1,2)(3,4)(5,6)(7,8),(1,3)(2,4)(5,7)(6,8),(1,5)(2,6)(3,7)(4,8)); StructureDescription(G);
.
As is irreductible over , , and since , .
These results imply that is the splitting field of the irreducible polynomial , that is a primitive element of , and that □