Exercise 6.5.7

Show that the implication ( a ) ( b ) of Theorem 6.5.5 is equivalent to Kronecker’s assertion that the roots of an Abelian equation over can be expressed rationally in terms of a root of unity.

Answers

Proof. Suppose that the implication (a) (b) of Theorem 6.5.5 is true.

Let f [ x ] such that the equation f = 0 is Abelian. Then f has a root α such that L = F ( α ) is the splitting field of F , so the extension F L is normal. By Theorem 6.5.3 (and Exercise 3), as the equation f = 0 is Abelian, Gal ( L ) is an Abelian group. The hypothesis (a) is so satisfied, and (b) follows : L ( ζ n ) , where ζ n = e 2 n . As the roots of f are in L , these roots can be expressed rationally in terms of a root of unity.

Conversely, suppose that the roots α 1 , , α n of any Abelian equation f = 0 in the splitting field of f can be expressed rationally in terms of a root of unity ζ n , and suppose also (a) : L , the extension L is normal, and Gal ( L ) is an Abellan group.

As the characteristic of is 0, L is also separable, and there exists a primitive element α for the extension L . Let f be the minimal polynomial of α over . By Exercise 6, since L is normal and separable, the equation f = 0 is Abelian. By hypothesis, the roots α 1 = α , , α n of f can be expressed rationally in terms of a root of unity ζ n , therefore α i ( ζ n ) , 1 i n . In particular α ( ζ n ) , thus L = ( α ) ( ζ n ) . (b) is so proved under the hypothesis (a).

Conclusion : (a) (b) is equivalent to the assertion of Kronecker : the roots of an Abelian equation over can be expressed rationally in terms of a root of unity. □

User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments