Homepage › Solution manuals › David A. Cox › Galois Theory › Exercise 6.5.7
Exercise 6.5.7
Show that the implication of Theorem 6.5.5 is equivalent to Kronecker’s assertion that the roots of an Abelian equation over can be expressed rationally in terms of a root of unity.
Answers
Proof. Suppose that the implication (a) (b) of Theorem 6.5.5 is true.
Let such that the equation is Abelian. Then has a root such that is the splitting field of , so the extension is normal. By Theorem 6.5.3 (and Exercise 3), as the equation is Abelian, is an Abelian group. The hypothesis (a) is so satisfied, and (b) follows : , where . As the roots of are in , these roots can be expressed rationally in terms of a root of unity.
Conversely, suppose that the roots of any Abelian equation in the splitting field of can be expressed rationally in terms of a root of unity , and suppose also (a) : , the extension is normal, and is an Abellan group.
As the characteristic of is 0, is also separable, and there exists a primitive element for the extension . Let be the minimal polynomial of over . By Exercise 6, since is normal and separable, the equation is Abelian. By hypothesis, the roots of can be expressed rationally in terms of a root of unity , therefore . In particular , thus . (b) is so proved under the hypothesis (a).
Conclusion : (a) (b) is equivalent to the assertion of Kronecker : the roots of an Abelian equation over can be expressed rationally in terms of a root of unity. □