Homepage › Solution manuals › David A. Cox › Galois Theory › Exercise 7.3.9
Exercise 7.3.9
Let be a field of characteristic different from 2, and let be a finite extension. Prove that the following are equivalent:
- (a)
- is a Galois extension of with .
- (b)
- is the splitting field of a polynomial of the form , where but do not lie in .
Answers
Proof. Suppose (b): is the splitting field of , where , but do not lie in .
The splitting field of is :
Consider the ascending chain of fields:
As , and since is a root of , thus .
We prove that . Suppose, at the contrary, that . Then
By squaring this equality, .
If , then , in contradiction with the hypothesis, so .
If , : this is excluded.
If , , so : this is also excluded.
This proves that , and is a root of , thus
Finally
As the characteristic of is not 2, , otherwise , and the same is true for . Moreover , otherwise , so
is a separable polynomial, and the splitting field of the separable polynomial is a Galois extension of . Therefore,
If , since is a root of , also, thus . Similarly . As is uniquely determined by the images of , there are at most 4 -automorphisms of .
As , these 4 possibilities occur, and give an element of the Galois group , otherwise this group would have less than 4 elements.
Then , where
As are of order 2,
Conversely, suppose (a):
is a Galois extension of , and .
Then
Write the elements of , where the identity of . As , and all the elements different from are of order 2.
The only non trivial subgroups have cardinality 2: they are .
The intermediate field corresponding with these subgroups are the fixed fields
As the index in of these three subgroups is 2, are quadratic extensions of (by Theorem 7.3.1 ). Since , is a quadratic extension of each of them.
As the characteristic of is different from 2, the Exercise 7.1.12 shows that , where . Write , then . Similarly .
, so .
by Theorem 7.1.1(b), so
Since , , thus .
Moreover is a root of , thus . Consequently .
and similarly
As , write . Then
Thus lies not in the fixed field of , so .
The intermediate extension contains and , so . Therefore, by the Galois correspondence, and , thus . Thus , and so .
As splits completely in , the splitting field of is .
The equivalence (a) (b) is proved. □