Homepage › Solution manuals › David A. Cox › Galois Theory › Exercise 8.2.2
Exercise 8.2.2
In the situation of Example 8.2.3, assume that is radical. Prove that , where for some .
Answers
Proof. : .
Note that of degree 3 is irreducible over , otherwise it would have a rational root .
Then , so , therefore , and similarly , thus , but neither 1 nor is a root of , so is irreducible.
By Exercise 8.2.1, the splitting field of over is
.
is a square in , so is the cyclic group (Prop. 7.4.2), and so .
Assume that the extension is radical.
As , it doesn’t exists any strict sub-extension of , so the definition of a radical extension imply the existence of and of an integer such that and . As the extension is of degree 3, it it not a quadratic extension, so .
We conclude the reasoning (Example 8.2.3):
Let be the minimal polynomial of over . Then . As is a root of , divides .
As the extension is a Galois extension, all the roots of are in so are real since . Thus the three real distinct roots of are among the roots of , that is
But this is impossible since at most two of these roots are real.
Conclusion: is not a radical extension (but , so is solvable). □