Homepage › Solution manuals › David S. Dummit › Abstract Algebra › Exercise 2.5.14 (Lattice of subgroups of the modular group $M$ of order $16$)
Exercise 2.5.14 (Lattice of subgroups of the modular group $M$ of order $16$)
Let be the group of order with the following presentation:
(sometimes called the modular group of order ). It has three subgroups of order : , , and and every subgroup is contained in one of these three. Prove that , and . Show that the lattice of subgroups of is the same as the lattice of subgroups of (cf. Exercise 13) but that these two groups are not isomorphic.
Answers
Proof. To begin with, we take for granted that has order and has three subgroups of order : , , and and every proper subgroup is contained in one of these three.
Then and are cyclic groups of order , so and .
Since , . Moreover, if , then has order : this is false, so . Moreover , so and . Note that
so and commute. Therefore
(If and , then defined by is an isomorphism.)
We know the lattice of the subgroups of ( se Ex.12). We infer the lattice of subgroups of by replacing by and by . Moreover, we know the lattice of the subgroups of cyclic groups. This gives
Then we glue together the three following lattices:
to obtain
This lattice is isomorphic to the lattice of subgroups of given in Exercise 13. Nevertheless the groups and are not isomorphic, because the former is not abelian, but the latter is abelian.
Now we prove the assertions of the statement, i.e. has order and contains three subgroups of order : , , and and every proper subgroup is contained in one of these three.
-
By definition of ,
By the relations (1), every element of is of the form , so has at most elements. We search how to multiply two such elements.
We show by induction that . This is true for . If we assume that for some integer , then
The induction is done, which proves that for all integers , . By multiplying this equality by on the left and on the right, we obtain , so . This shows that for all ,
If , then
and if ,
In both case we obtain for all integers ,
This suggests considering the semi-direct product , where
Since , is an automorphism of , and since , is a homomorphism. The law on the group is given by
Put and . Then and . Moreover
so . Since and , where , by van Dyck’s Theorem, there is a surjective homomorphism
such that and . Therefore , and we know also that , so .
Since is a surjective homomorphism, where , then is an isomorphism, so
In particular,
Note that and , where and , hence and .
-
Since ,
where all these elements are distinct.
Moreover, has order , thus
has order .
In , we obtain
This sho<s that the order of is , thus . Therefore
has order .
Finally,
Since and commute, is a subgroup of which contains and , thus , so . This shows that
has order .
Knowing that , the arguments of the first part show that
-
It remains to show that every proper subgroup of is contained in one of these three, so that there is no other subgroup of than those given in the preceding figure.
We first compute the center of . Let be any element of . Then if and only if for all integers , . By (3), this gives . Therefore
If , then for all . For and , this gives , thus . For all , , therefore , so for all . In particular, for , we obtain , where or , thus . This shows that , so .
Conversely, commutes with and with , because where , thus , and , so
We have proved that
Therefore . Thus every cyclic subgroup satisfies or or , where , , are subgroups, so , or or .
Now let be any proper subgroup of . Then has order or .
If , then is cyclic, so or or by the preceding argument.
We suppose now that , i.e., or .
We prove first that , so that .
If , since , we may assert that don’t belong to , so
This implies that . This is impossible because , where . This contradiction shows that for every subgroup such that ,
Since , the subgroup is normal in , so we may consider the quotient group . The classes and are generators of and since ,
Since (see Ex. 12), by van Dyck’s Theorem, this exists a surjective homomorphism such that and , so
By Theorem 20 (the Fourth or Lattice Isomorphism Theorem), there is a bijection from the set of subgroups which contain onto the set of . By Exercise 12, there are exactly proper subgroups of , therefore there are exactly proper subgroups of which contain . We know already such subgroups by the first part, i.e.,
and all are subgroups of , or .
In conclusion, every subgroup of of order or contains and is contained in , or . This shows that every proper subgroup of is contained in , or . There are no other subgroups besides those already known in the lattice of the first part, which is complete.