Homepage › Solution manuals › David S. Dummit › Abstract Algebra › Exercise 3.2.9 (Cauchy's Theorem)
Exercise 3.2.9 (Cauchy's Theorem)
This exercise outlines a proof of Cauchy’s Theorem due to James McKay (“Another proof of Cauchy’s group theorem”, Amer. Math. Monthly, 66(1959), p. 119). Let be a finite group and let be a prime dividing . Let denote the set of -tuples of elements of the product of whose coordinates is :
- (a)
-
Show that
has
elements, hence has order divisible by
.
Define the relation on by letting if is a cyclic permutation of .
- (b)
- Show that a cyclic permutation of an element of is again an element of .
- (c)
- Prove that is an equivalence relation on .
- (d)
- Prove that an equivalence class contains a single element if and only if it is of the form with .
- (e)
- Prove that every equivalence class has order or (this uses the fact that is a prime). Deduce that , where is the number of classes of size and is the number of classes of size .
- (f)
- Since is an equivalence class of size , conclude from (e) that there must be a nonidentity element in with , i.e., contains an element of order . [Show and so .]
Answers
Proof. Let be a finite group of order and let be a prime dividing , and let
- (a)
-
Let’s calculate the cardinality of
. Note that a
-tuple of
is determined by its first
elements.
More precisely, let’s define by:
where because .Then , satisfy and :
and since
we obtain
This shows that and , so is bijective.
Thus
(Therefore divides .)
- (b)
-
If
and
, we define
This defines a right action of on : if , then
In particular, if is the cyclic permutation , then
We first show that .
In every group , if if satisfy , then , so
If , then . We apply (2) to and , so that . We obtain , i.e.
Therefore . In conclusion,
Then for every integer ,
This means that
( I interpret the ambiguous question "A cyclic permutation of an element of is again an element of ” as this result.)
- (c)
-
By part (b), the group
acts to the right on
, where
.
We define on by
that is
This relation is the usual relation which expresses the fact that and are in the same orbit for the (right) action of on . We recall (see Prop. 2 p.114) that this is an equivalence relation:
- , so .
-
If , then there exists such that . Since is a right action of on ,
so .
-
If and , then there are integers such that and . Using the same right action,
so .
The class of is the orbit of under the action of :
- (d)
-
Let
. If
, then
, and more generally
for
. So
So if and only if for some , and since , .
- (e)
-
If
is the stabilizer of
under the action of
, then (Proposition 2, section 4.1, p. 114)
so . This shows that is a divisor of , where is a prime number, therefore
Let
By part (d), is the set of elements of whose class contains a single element, so that is the number of classes of size , and let be the number of classes of size .
Let be a complete system of representatives of the classes. Since the classes form a partition of ,
If an orbit is a class which contains a single element, i.e., , then its unique representative is , thus , and
because every orbit , where , has size , and there are such classes.
- (f)
-
Since the class of
has size
,
, so
.
By part (e), , thus , where . Therefore , so contains an element , where , . Then , therefore
This shows that the order of is :
Every group such that divides contains an element of order (Cauchy’s Theorem).