Homepage › Solution manuals › David S. Dummit › Abstract Algebra › Exercise 3.4.6 (First part of Jordan-Hölder Theorem)
Exercise 3.4.6 (First part of Jordan-Hölder Theorem)
Prove part (1) of the Jordan-Hölder Theorem by induction on
Answers
I reproduce with the notations of Dummit & Foote the already given solution of Exercise 8.4.6 of David Cox “Galois Theory” on Solverer.
Proof. Let be a finite group.
- (a)
-
Let
be a normal subgroup of
of maximal order (since
is finite and
, such a subgroup exists). We show that
is a simple group.
If were not simple, would have a normal subgroup ,
where is the identity of . Let , defined by , be the canonical projection, and let .
Since , then (because is surjective, so ), therefore
We show that . Let . Then and , where , hence , so .
and is in contradiction with the definition of as normal subgroup of of maximal order, so such a subgroup of doesn’t exist.
is a simple group.
- (b)
-
If
, then
is simple, and has a composition series
.
Reasoning by complete induction, we suppose that every non trivial group of order less that has a composition series, and let be a group of order .
By part (a), there exists a normal subgroup of maximal order such that
where is simple.
If , then is simple and is a composition series.
Otherwise, since , the induction hypothesis gives a composition series for :
where is simple ( ).
Then
is a composition series for , since is simple by part (a). So the induction is done.
Every non trivial finite group has a composition series.