Homepage › Solution manuals › David S. Dummit › Abstract Algebra › Exercise 4.3.28(Groups of order $pq$ as permutation groups)
Exercise 4.3.28(Groups of order $pq$ as permutation groups)
Let and be primes with . Prove that a non-abelian group of order has a non-normal subgroup of index , so that there exists an injective homomorphism into . Deduce that is isomorphic to a subgroup of the normalizer in of the cyclic group generated by the -cycle .
Answers
Proof. Let be a non-abelian group of order (where and are prime numbers).
By Cauchy’s Theorem, there exists an element of order in , so is a subgroup of order , and . Since is the smallest prime dividing , then by Corollary 5 (p.120).
Moreover there is an element of order in , so is a subgroup of order and index .
Assume for the sake of contradiction that is normal in .
By Lagrange’s Theorem divides and , so and . Then by Proposition 13 p. 93, , so . In summary
- (i)
- ,
- (ii)
- ,
- (iii)
- .
Consider the map
By (i), is surjective. If , then , thus by (ii), therefore , so is injective.
Moreover, if and , then by (iii), , thus . If and , then
so is an isomorphism, and . Since and are cyclic, is abelian, in contradiction with the hypothesis. This contradiction shows that is not normal in .
Now consider the action of on the set of left cosets of , where . This action affords a representation , defined by
Recall that , where . We claim that
Indeed these left cosets of are distinct: if , where , then , therefore , where , so . Since there are such cosets, this proves (2).
Consider the bijection given by
| … | q | |||
i.e.,
This labelling of the cosets affords a permutation representation , defined by
Then for all , so that the following diagram is commutative
Writing , the definitions (2) and (3) imply
Then
so is a homomorphism.
By Theorem 3 p. 119,
Since is not normal in , there is some such that . Therefore is a subgroup of , and , otherwise , where , so , which contradicts the definition of . Since the order of is prime, this shows that for some . Since , we obtain
So the action of on is faithful, and is an injective homomorphism.
If , then , thus . This shows that is an injective homomorphism.
Put . We compute and .
By (5), for all ,
Therefore
(So corresponds to the element in the permutation representation.)
Since , , so
To compute , note that , since . Therefore there is some fixed integer such that
Moreover, by (2), there is some fixed integer so that , thus
Then for all integers , . Hence for all
This shows that
where denotes the representative of the class of modulo such that . (Note : the permutation group of such permutations is known as . This group was studied by Lagrange and Galois.)
It remains to prove that . Using the notation , we obtain for all ,
So , and
More generally, for all integers , . This shows that normalizes , so
Let . Since is an injective homomorphism, is a permutation group isomorphic to , and
By (6) and (7), , so
is isomorphic to a subgroup of the normalizer in of the cyclic group generated by the -cycle . □
Note 1: The normalizer in of the cyclic group generated by the -cycle is the whole group (see David Cox, “Galois Theory" Lemma 14.1.2 p. 414).
Note 2. Cox proves a generalization of the preceding result in Proposition 14.1.4:
“Every solvable transitive subgroup is conjugate to a subgroup of containing .”
This is part of the proof of Galois Theorem on solvable irreducible polynomials of prime degree (Cox, Theorem 14.1.1 p. 413)