Homepage › Solution manuals › David S. Dummit › Abstract Algebra › Exercise 4.5.31 ($n_p(A_5)$ and $n_p(S_5)$)
Exercise 4.5.31 ($n_p(A_5)$ and $n_p(S_5)$)
For and find and [Note that .]
Answers
Proof. The elements of order in are the cycles of order . Since any two distinct Sylow -subgroups have trivial intersection, there are elements of order in , thus
Since any two distinct Sylow -subgroups have trivial intersection, there are elements of order (no surprise : there are cycles of order in ).
There are cycles of order in , and the elements of order in are -cycles. Since any two distinct Sylow -subgroups have trivial intersection, , thus
Since the -cycles are odd permutations, there are no -cycle in a Sylow -subgroup of . The elements of any Sylow -subgroup of are (except the identity) the commutative product of two disjoint transpositions.
Note that
Since two Sylow -subgroups of are conjugate, every Sylow -subgroups of is of the form
Each such subgroup is determined by the missing element, so there are such subgroups:
(This is compatible with Sylow’s Theorem, which gives
The elements of order in are the cycles of order . Since any two distinct Sylow -subgroups have trivial intersection, there are elements of order , thus
There are cycles of order in , and the elements of order in are -cycles. Since any two distinct Sylow -subgroups have trivial intersection, , thus
Note that
is a Sylow -subgroup of . Since two Sylow -subgroup are conjugate, every Sylow -subgroup is of the form
Since (because ), and (because ), we obtain distinct Sylow -subgroups of , so
(This is compatible with Sylow’s Theorem, which gives
□
Proof. The elements of order in are the cycles of order . Since any two distinct Sylow -subgroups have trivial intersection, there are elements of order in , thus
Since any two distinct Sylow -subgroups have trivial intersection, there are elements of order (no surprise : there are cycles of order in ).
There are cycles of order in , and the elements of order in are -cycles. Since any two distinct Sylow -subgroups have trivial intersection, , thus
Since the -cycles are odd permutations, there are no -cycle in a Sylow -subgroup of . The elements of any Sylow -subgroup of are (except the identity) the commutative product of two disjoint transpositions.
Note that
Since two Sylow -subgroups of are conjugate, every Sylow -subgroups of is of the form
Each such subgroup is determined by the missing element, so there are such subgroups:
(This is compatible with Sylow’s Theorem, which gives
The elements of order in are the cycles of order . Since any two distinct Sylow -subgroups have trivial intersection, there are elements of order , thus
There are cycles of order in , and the elements of order in are -cycles. Since any two distinct Sylow -subgroups have trivial intersection, , thus
Note that
is a Sylow -subgroup of . Since two Sylow -subgroup are conjugate, every Sylow -subgroup is of the form
Since (because ), and (because ), we obtain distinct Sylow -subgroups of , so
(This is compatible with Sylow’s Theorem, which gives
□
We check with Sagemath:
sage: G = AlternatingGroup(5) sage: p = gap(’(1,2)(3,4)’); q = gap(’(1,3)(2,4)’) sage: H = G.subgroup([p,q]); H.list() [(), (1,3)(2,4), (1,2)(3,4), (1,4)(2,3)] sage: n_2 = G.order()/ G.normalizer(H).order();n_2 5 sage: G = SymmetricGroup(5) sage: p = gap(’(1,2)(3,4)’); q = gap(’(1,3)’) sage: H = G.subgroup([p,q]); H.order() 8 sage: n_2 = G.order()/ G.normalizer(H).order();n_2 15
This confirms and