Homepage › Solution manuals › David S. Dummit › Abstract Algebra › Exercise 4.5.53 (If $G$ is any non-abelian group in which every proper subgroup is abelian then $G$ is not simple)
Exercise 4.5.53 (If $G$ is any non-abelian group in which every proper subgroup is abelian then $G$ is not simple)
Use the preceding exercise to prove that if is any non-abelian group in which every proper subgroup is abelian then is not simple. [Let be a counterexample to this assertion and use Exercise 24 in Section 3 to show that as more than one conjugacy class of maximal subgroups. Use the method of Exercise 23 in Section 3 to count the elements which lie in all conjugates of and , where and are nonconjugate maximal subgroups of ; show that this gives more than elements.]
Answers
Proof. Reasoning by contradiction, let be a counterexample to the assertion of the statement. Then is a simple non-abelian group, and every proper subgroup of is abelian.
-
Since , contains some maximal subgroup . We write the distinct conjugate subgroups of .
By Exercise 4.3.24, . Therefore there is some such that . Then the subgroup is contained in some maximal subgroup . Moreover for all indices , since but , so and are not conjugate subgroups. We write the distinct conjugate subgroups of . Then
- Note that is a maximal subgroup for every : is a proper subgroup of , and if , where is some subgroup of , then . Since is maximal, or . In the latter case , and in the former case . This proves that is a maximal subgroup of . Similarly is a maximal subgroup of for all .
-
The subgroups and for and are distinct maximal subgroups of the simple group , so they are abelian subgroups. By Exercise 52, the intersection of any two such subgroups is trivial. Therefore the union in (1) is a disjoint union. This shows that
so
-
The maximal subgroup cannot be trivial, otherwise, for some , implies , thus would be cyclic, but is not abelian by hypothesis. Since , where is maximal, then or . In the latter case, . This is impossible since is simple and is a proper nontrivial subgroup of . This proves , and similarly .
Then the number of distinct conjugates of is , and we have a similar result for :
-
Then (2) gives
because if and only if , and this last assertion is true, because and are not trivial, so and .
- is a contradiction, which proves that if is any non-abelian group in which every proper subgroup is abelian then is not simple.