Homepage Solution manuals David S. Dummit Abstract Algebra Exercise 4.5.53 (If $G$ is any non-abelian group in which every proper subgroup is abelian then $G$ is not simple)

Exercise 4.5.53 (If $G$ is any non-abelian group in which every proper subgroup is abelian then $G$ is not simple)

Use the preceding exercise to prove that if G is any non-abelian group in which every proper subgroup is abelian then G is not simple. [Let G be a counterexample to this assertion and use Exercise 24 in Section 3 to show that G as more than one conjugacy class of maximal subgroups. Use the method of Exercise 23 in Section 3 to count the elements which lie in all conjugates of M and N , where M and N are nonconjugate maximal subgroups of G ; show that this gives more than | G | elements.]

Answers

Proof. Reasoning by contradiction, let G be a counterexample to the assertion of the statement. Then G is a simple non-abelian group, and every proper subgroup of G is abelian.

  • Since G { 1 } , G contains some maximal subgroup M . We write g 1 M g 1 1 , , g k M g k 1 the distinct conjugate subgroups of M .

    By Exercise 4.3.24, G i = 1 k g i M g i 1 . Therefore there is some h G such that h i = 1 k g i M g i 1 . Then the subgroup h is contained in some maximal subgroup N . Moreover N g i M g i 1 for all indices i , since h N but h g i M g i 1 , so M and N are not conjugate subgroups. We write h 1 N h 1 1 , , h l N h l 1 the distinct conjugate subgroups of N . Then

    G { 1 } i = 1 k ( g i M g i 1 { 1 } ) j = 1 l ( h j N h j 1 { 1 } ) . (1)
  • Note that 𝑔𝑀 g 1 is a maximal subgroup for every g G : 𝑔𝑀 g 1 is a proper subgroup of G , and if 𝑔𝑀 g 1 H , where H is some subgroup of G , then M g 1 𝐻𝑔 . Since M is maximal, g 1 𝐻𝑔 = M or g 1 𝐻𝑔 = G . In the latter case H = G , and in the former case H = 𝑔𝑀 g 1 . This proves that 𝑔𝑀 g 1 is a maximal subgroup of G . Similarly h𝑁 h 1 is a maximal subgroup of G for all h G .
  • The subgroups g i M g i 1 and h j N h j 1 for 1 i k and 1 j l are distinct maximal subgroups of the simple group G , so they are abelian subgroups. By Exercise 52, the intersection of any two such subgroups is trivial. Therefore the union in (1) is a disjoint union. This shows that

    | G | 1 i = 1 k | g i M g i 1 { 1 } | + j = 1 l | h j N h j 1 { 1 } ) | ,

    so

    | G | 1 k ( | M | 1 ) + l ( | N | 1 ) . (2)
  • The maximal subgroup M cannot be trivial, otherwise, for some g 1 , M = { 1 } < g implies G = g , thus G would be cyclic, but G is not abelian by hypothesis. Since M N G ( M ) , where M is maximal, then N G ( M ) = M or N G ( M ) = G . In the latter case, M G . This is impossible since G is simple and M is a proper nontrivial subgroup of G . This proves N G ( M ) = M , and similarly N G ( N ) = N .

    Then the number k of distinct conjugates of M is k = | G : N G ( M ) | = | G : M | , and we have a similar result for N :

    k = | G : M | , l = | G : N | .

  • Then (2) gives

    | G | 1 | G | | M | ( | M | 1 ) + | G | | N | ( | N | 1 ) = | G | ( 2 1 | M | 1 | N | ) | G | ,

    because 2 1 | M | 1 | N | 1 if and only if 1 | M | + 1 | N | 1 , and this last assertion is true, because M and N are not trivial, so | M | 2 and | N | 2 .

  • | G | 1 | G | is a contradiction, which proves that if G is any non-abelian group in which every proper subgroup is abelian then G is not simple.
User profile picture
2026-04-12 11:51
Comments