Homepage › Solution manuals › David S. Dummit › Abstract Algebra › Problem 5.1.4 (Sylow subgroups of a direct product)

Problem 5.1.4 (Sylow subgroups of a direct product)

Let A and B be finite groups and let p be a prime. Prove that any Sylow p -subgroup of A × B is of the form P × Q , where P ∈ 𝑆𝑦 l p ( A ) and Q ∈ 𝑆𝑦 l p ( B ) . Prove that n p ( A × B ) = n p ( A ) n p ( B ) . Generalize both of these results to a direct product of any finite number of finite groups (so that the number of Sylow p -subgroups of a direct product is the product of the numbers of Sylow p -subgroups of the factors).

Answers

Proof. Write

| A | = p α r , | B | = p β s , where  p ∤ r , p ∤ s .

Then

| A × B | = | A | | B | = p α + β m , where  m = 𝑟𝑠 ,  and  p ∤ m . (1)

If P ∈ 𝑆𝑦 l p ( A ) and Q ∈ 𝑆𝑦 l p ( B ) , then | P | = p α and | Q | = p β , thus | P × Q | = p α + β . Therefore, by (1), P × Q is a Sylow p -subgroup of A × B .

Conversely, suppose that H is a Sylow p -subgroup of A × B . Then | H | = p α + β .

Put

à = { ( a , 1 ) ∣ a ∈ A } ≃ A , B ~ = { ( 1 , b ) ∣ b ∈ 𝐴𝐵 } ≃ B .

so that à and B ~ are subgroups of A × B isomorphic to A and B .

By Sylow’s Theorem, there is some Sylow p -subgroup P 0 of A , and some Sylow p -subgroup Q 0 of B , satisfying | P 0 | = p α and | Q 0 | = p β . Then P ~ 0 = P 0 × { 1 } ∈ 𝑆𝑦 l p ( Ã ) and Q ~ 0 = { 1 } × Q 0 ∈ 𝑆𝑦 l p ( B ~ ) , so P ~ 0 ≤ Ã and Q ~ 0 ≤ B ~ are p -subgroups of G = A × B .

By the third part of Sylow’s Theorem, there exist g = ( g 1 , g 2 ) and h = ( h 1 , h 2 ) such that

P ~ 0 ≤ 𝑔𝐻 g − 1 , Q ~ 0 ≤ h𝐻 h − 1 .

We define

P ~ = g − 1 P ~ 0 g , Q ~ = h − 1 Q ~ 0 h ,

so that P ~ ≤ H and Q ~ ≤ H . Note that g − 1 P ~ 0 g = ( g 1 − 1 , g 2 − 1 ) ( P 0 × { 1 } ) ( g 1 , g 2 ) = g 1 − 1 P 0 g 1 × { 1 } ≤ Ã , thus P ~ = P × { 1 } , where P = g 1 − 1 P 0 g 1 is a Sylow p -subgroup of A , and similarly Q ~ = { 1 } × Q , where Q = h 2 − 1 Q 0 h 2 is a Sylow p -subgroup of B .

Since P ~ ≤ H and Q ~ ≤ H , then P ~ Q ~ ≤ H . Moreover P × Q = P ~ Q ~ , since ( p , q ) = ( p , 1 ) ( 1 , q ) . Therefore | P ~ Q ~ | = | P | | Q | = p α + β = | H | , thus H = P ~ Q ~ = P × Q .

Any Sylow p -subgroup H of A × B is of the unique form P × Q , where P ∈ 𝑆𝑦 l p ( A ) and Q ∈ 𝑆𝑦 l p ( B ) , and conversely.

In other words, the map

{ 𝑆𝑦 l p ( A ) × 𝑆𝑦 l p ( B ) → 𝑆𝑦 l p ( A × B ) ( P , Q ) ↦ P × Q

is bijective. Hence | 𝑆𝑦 l p ( A × B ) | = | 𝑆𝑦 l p ( A ) | ⋅ | 𝑆𝑦 l p ( B ) | , so

n p ( A × B ) = n p ( A ) n p ( B ) . (2)

Suppose that this result is true for the product of n − 1 subgroups, and consider G = A 1 × A 2 × ⋯ × A n . If we apply the preceding result to A = A 1 × A 2 × ⋯ × A n − 1 and B = A n , then

n p ( A 1 × A 2 × ⋯ × A n ) = n p ( A × B ) = n p ( A ) n p ( B ) = n p ( A 1 × A 2 × ⋯ × A n − 1 ) n p ( A n ) = n p ( A 1 ) n p ( A 2 ) ⋯ n p ( A n − 1 ) n p ( A n ) ,

by the induction hypothesis.

The induction is done, which proves that for all positive integers n ≥ 2 ,

n p ( A 1 × A 2 × ⋯ × A n ) = n p ( A 1 ) n p ( A 2 ) ⋯ n p ( A n ) .

□

User profile picture
2026-09-05 11:41
Comments