Exercise 1.2.13 (First cases of Little Fermat's Theorem)

Prove that n 2 n is divisible by 2 for every integer n ; that n 3 n is divisible by 6 ; that n 5 n is divisible by 30 .

Answers

Proof. Let n .

(a)
If n is odd, then 2 n 1 , and if n is even, 2 n . In both cases, 2 n ( n 1 ) = n 2 n .
(b)
We proved in Exercise 6 that the product of three consecutive integers is divisible par 6 . Therefore 6 ( n 1 ) n ( n + 1 ) = n 3 n .

(c)
We first show that 5 n 5 n .

First proof: One of the five consecutive integers n 2 , n 1 , n , n + 1 , n + 2 is divisible by 5 . Therefore

5 ( n 2 ) ( n 1 ) n ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) .

Therefore 5 n ( n 2 1 ) ( n 2 4 ) = n ( n 2 1 ) ( n 2 + 1 5 ) = n ( n 2 1 ) ( n 2 + 1 ) 5 n ( n 2 1 ) . This shows that 5 n ( n 2 1 ) ( n 2 + 1 ) = n 5 n .

Second proof : by induction. First 5 0 5 0 = 0 . Now assume that 5 n 5 n , so that n 5 n = 5 k , k . Then, using the binomial formula,

( n + 1 ) 5 ( n + 1 ) = ( n 5 + 5 n 4 + 10 n 3 + 10 n 2 + 5 n + 1 ) ( n + 1 ) = ( n 5 n ) + 5 ( n 4 + 2 n 3 + 2 n 2 + n ) = 5 ( k + n 4 + 2 n 3 + 2 n 2 + n ) .

Therefore 5 ( n + 1 ) 5 ( n + 1 ) , and the induction is done. We can conclude, for all n ,

5 n 5 n .

Moreover, if n , then m = n N , thus 5 m 5 m = ( n 5 n ) , so 5 n 5 n :

n , 5 n 5 n .

Conclusion: Since 6 ( n 1 ) n ( n + 1 ) by part (b) and

( n 1 ) n ( n + 1 ) n 5 n = n ( n 2 1 ) ( n 2 + 1 ) = [ ( n 1 ) n ( n + 1 ) ] ( n 2 + 1 ) ,

we obtain 6 n 5 n .

Since 6 and 5 are relatively prime, for all n ,

30 n 5 n .

Note: 2 n 2 n , 3 n 3 n , 5 n 5 n are particular cases of Little Fermat’s Theorem.

User profile picture
2024-06-16 16:23
Comments