Homepage Solution manuals Ivan Niven An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers Exercise 1.3.52* (There are infinitely many primes, third proof (topological proof))

Exercise 1.3.52* (There are infinitely many primes, third proof (topological proof))

(For readers familiar with the rudiments of point-set topology.) We topologize the integers as follows: a set 𝒩 of integers is open if for every n 𝒩 there is an arithmetic progression 𝒜 such that n 𝒜 𝒩 . (An arithmetic progression is a set of the form { dk + r : k } with d 0 .) Prove that arbitrary unions of open sets are open, and that finite intersections of open sets are open, so that these open sets define a topology in the usual sense. (From a more advanced perspective, this is known as a profinite topology.) As is usual in topology, we call a set 𝒩 closed if its complement 𝒩 is open. Let 𝒜 be an arithmetic progression. Prove that the complement of 𝒜 is a union of arithmetic progressions. Deduce that 𝒜 is both open and closed. Let 𝒰 denote the union over all prime numbers p of the arithmetic progressions { np : n } , and let 𝒱 denote the complement of 𝒰 . In symbols, 𝒰 = p pℤ and 𝒱 = 𝒰 . Show that 𝒱 = { 1 , 1 } . Show that if there were only finitely many prime numbers then the set 𝒰 would be closed. From the observation that 𝒱 is not an open set, conclude that there exist infinitely many prime numbers.

Answers

Proof. a) We verify first that the open sets define a topology. Note that and are open sets.

Let ( 𝒪 i ) i I be a family of open sets, and 𝒪 = i I 𝒪 i . Let n be any element in 𝒪 . Then there is some j I such that n 𝒪 j . Since 𝒪 j is open, there is an arithmetic progression 𝒜 = { dk + r : k } such that 𝒜 𝒪 j . Moreover 𝒪 j 𝒪 = i I 𝒪 i , thus n 𝒜 𝒪 . Since this is true for every n 𝒪 , 𝒪 is an open set.

Now consider a family ( 𝒪 i ) i I , where I = [ [ 1 , m ] ] , m , is finite, and 𝒪 = i = 1 m 𝒪 i . If n 𝒪 , then n 𝒪 i for every i [ [ 1 , m ] ] . Therefore there are arithmetic progressions 𝒜 i = { d i k + r i : k } 𝒪 i , such that n 𝒜 i , for for every i [ [ 1 , m ] ] . Thus there is k i such that

n = d i k i + r i , i = 1 , , m .

Consider the arithmetic progression

𝒜 = { d 1 d m k + n : k } .

Then n = d 1 d m 0 + r 𝒜 . Moreover, we will show that 𝒜 𝒜 i 𝒪 i for every i [ [ 1 , m ] ] .

Let a 𝒜 . Then a = d 1 d m k + n for some k . For every i [ [ 1 , m ] ] ,

a = d 1 d m k + n = d 1 d m k + d i k i + r i = d i ( j i d j + k i ) + r i = d i l i + r i ,

where l i = j i d j + k i . Therefore a 𝒜 i 𝒪 i . This proves

𝒜 𝒜 i 𝒪 i , i = 1 , , m ,

so

n 𝒜 i = 1 m 𝒪 i .

This shows that i = 1 m 𝒪 i is an open set. So the open sets define a topology.

b) Let 𝒜 = { dk + r : k } be an arithmetic progression. Since { dk + r : k } = { ( d ) k + r : k } , we can assume d > 0 . If r is the remainder of the division of r by d , then r = d q 0 + r , where 0 r < d , and

𝒜 = { dk + r : k } , d > 0 , 0 r < d .

So we can always assume d > 0 and 0 r < d to define an arithmetic progression.

We prove that 𝒜 is a (finite) union of arithmetic progressions. Let

𝒜 i = { dk + i : k } , i = 0 , , d 1 , i r .

If j 𝒜 , then the Euclidean division of j by d > 0 gives j = dq + i , 0 i < d . Moreover i r , otherwise j 𝒜 . So

𝒜 i [ [ 0 , d 1 ] ] { r } 𝒜 i .

Conversely, if j i [ [ 0 , d 1 ] ] { r } 𝒜 i , then j = dq + i , q for some i such that 0 i < d , i r . Assume for contradiction that j 𝒜 , then

j = dk + r = dq + i , 0 r < d , 0 i < d .

The unicity of quotient and remainder in the Euclidean division shows that i = r . This is a contradiction, because i r . So j 𝒜 . This proves

i [ [ 0 , d 1 ] ] { r } 𝒜 i 𝒜 .

So 𝒜 = i [ [ 0 , d 1 ] ] { r } 𝒜 i is a finite union of arithmetic progressions.

Since every element of 𝒜 is in the arithmetic progression 𝒜 , 𝒜 is open by definition.

Since 𝒜 is a finite union of arithmetic progressions, it is closed. So 𝒜 is both open and closed.

c) Write = { 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , 11 , } the set of prime numbers. Let

𝒰 = p pℤ , 𝒱 = 𝒰 .

We show that 𝒱 = { 1 , 1 } .

First, p 1 , p 1 for every prime number p , so { 1 , 1 } 𝒱 .

Now take n { 1 , 1 } . If n = 0 , then 0 2 𝒰 . If n 0 (and n 1 , n 1 ), n is divisible by some prime number p , so n 𝒰 . This shows that { 1 , 1 } 𝒰 , therefore 𝒱 = 𝒰 { 1 , 1 } , so

𝒱 = { 1 , 1 } .

d) 𝒱 is not an open set. Otherwise 1 𝒜 { 1 , 1 } , where 𝒜 is some arithmetic progression. Since 𝒜 is infinite, and { 1 , 1 } finite, 𝒜 { 1 , 1 } is impossible. So 𝒱 is not open.

If there were only finitely many prime numbers, then 𝒰 = p pℤ would be a finite union of closed sets (by part (b)), so would be itself a closed set. Then 𝒱 would be an open set.

This is a contradiction, so there are infinitely many prime numbers. □

User profile picture
2024-07-19 10:09
Comments