Exercise 3.5.15* (Fundamental discriminants)

Suppose that d 0 or 1 ( mod 4 ) and that d is not a perfect square. Then d is called a fundamental discriminant (or reduced discriminant) if all binary quadratic forms of discriminant d are primitive. Show that if d 1 ( mod 4 ) then d is a fundamental discriminant if and only if d is square-free. Show that if d 0 ( mod 4 ) then d is a fundamental discriminant if and only if d 4 is square-free and d 4 2 or 3 ( mod 4 ) .

Answers

Example 1: any form of discriminant 4 is equivalent to the form x 2 + y 2 , so is primitive. Thus 4 is a fundamental discriminant.

Example 2: the discriminant 36 is not a fundamental discriminant, because ( 3 , 0 , 3 ) is a non-primitive form of discriminant 36 .

Proof. :

  • Case d 1 ( mod 4 ) .

    (⇐)
    If d is not a fundamental discriminant, then there exists a non-primitive form ( a , b , c ) of discriminant d . Thus, there exists e > 1 such that a = eA , b = eB , c = eC , A , B , C . Then d = e 2 ( B 2 4 AC ) , e > 1 , has a square factor.
    (⇒)
    Suppose that d has a square factor e 2 : d = e 2 m , e > 1 . Then e is odd, so e 2 1 ( mod 4 ) . Since d 1 ( mod 4 ) , then m 1 ( mod 4 ) . So m is a discriminant, of the principal form f = ( 1 , 1 , 1 m 4 ) . Thus d is the discriminant of the form ef = ( e , e , e 1 m 4 ) , which is not primitive, and so d is not a fundamental discriminant.

    If d 1 ( mod 4 ) then d is a fundamental discriminant if and only if d is square-free.

  • Case d 0 ( mod 4 ) .

    (⇐)
    Suppose that d 4 2 , 3 ( mod 4 ) , and that d 4 is square-free. Reasoning by contradiction, if d is not a fundamental discriminant, then as in the previous case, d is the discriminant of a form ( a , b , c ) where a = eA , b = eB , c = eC , e > 1 .

    Then d = e 2 ( B 2 4 AC ) . If e is even, then e = 2 e , so d 4 = e 2 ( B 2 4 AC ) ( e B ) 2 0 or 1 ( mod 4 ) , which is contrary to the hypothesis. So e is odd, which means that B 2 4 AC is even, so B is even: B = 2 B . Thus d 4 = e 2 ( B 2 AC ) (where e > 1 ), so d 4 has a square factor, which is contrary to the hypothesis. It is thus proven that the hypotheses " d 4 2 , 3 ( mod 4 ) , and d 4 is without a square factor" indeed imply that d is a fundamental discriminant.

    (⇒)
    If d 4 0 ( mod 4 ) , then d = 4 2 m , m , and 4 m 0 ( mod 4 ) , so 4 m is a discriminant, of the form f = ( 1 , 0 , m ) , so d is the discriminant of the form 2 f = ( 2 , 0 , 2 m ) , which is not primitive.

    If d 4 1 ( mod 4 ) , then d = 4 m , m 1 ( mod 4 ) , so m is a discriminant, of the form f = ( 1 , 1 , 1 m 4 ) . So d is the discriminant of the form 2 f = ( 2 , 2 , 1 m 2 ) , and d is not a fundamental discriminant.

    This proves that a fundamental discriminant d 0 ( mod 4 ) satisfies d 4 2 , 3 ( mod 4 ) . It remains to prove that d 4 is square-free. If this were not the case, then d = 4 e 2 m , where e > 1 , and 4 m 0 ( mod 4 ) is a discriminant, of the form f = ( 1 , 0 , m ) , and d is the discriminant of the form ef = ( e , 0 , em ) , which contradicts the fact that d is a fundamental discriminant.

    If d 0 ( mod 4 ) then d is a fundamental discriminant if and only if d 4 is square-free and d 4 2 or 3 ( mod 4 ) .

User profile picture
2024-11-23 09:00
Comments