Homepage › Solution manuals › Ivan Niven › An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers › Exercise 3.5.15* (Fundamental discriminants)
Exercise 3.5.15* (Fundamental discriminants)
Suppose that or and that is not a perfect square. Then is called a fundamental discriminant (or reduced discriminant) if all binary quadratic forms of discriminant are primitive. Show that if then is a fundamental discriminant if and only if is square-free. Show that if then is a fundamental discriminant if and only if is square-free and or .
Answers
Example 1: any form of discriminant is equivalent to the form , so is primitive. Thus is a fundamental discriminant.
Example 2: the discriminant is not a fundamental discriminant, because is a non-primitive form of discriminant .
Proof. :
-
Case .
- If is not a fundamental discriminant, then there exists a non-primitive form of discriminant . Thus, there exists such that . Then , has a square factor.
- Suppose that has a square factor : . Then is odd, so . Since , then . So is a discriminant, of the principal form . Thus is the discriminant of the form , which is not primitive, and so is not a fundamental discriminant.
If then is a fundamental discriminant if and only if is square-free.
-
Case .
-
Suppose that
, and that
is square-free. Reasoning by contradiction, if
is not a fundamental discriminant, then as in the previous case,
is the discriminant of a form
where
.
Then . If is even, then , so or , which is contrary to the hypothesis. So is odd, which means that is even, so is even: . Thus (where ), so has a square factor, which is contrary to the hypothesis. It is thus proven that the hypotheses " , and is without a square factor" indeed imply that is a fundamental discriminant.
-
If
, then
, and
, so
is a discriminant, of the form
, so
is the discriminant of the form
, which is not primitive.
If , then , so is a discriminant, of the form . So is the discriminant of the form , and is not a fundamental discriminant.
This proves that a fundamental discriminant satisfies . It remains to prove that is square-free. If this were not the case, then where , and is a discriminant, of the form , and is the discriminant of the form , which contradicts the fact that is a fundamental discriminant.
If then is a fundamental discriminant if and only if is square-free and or .