Homepage › Solution manuals › Ivan Niven › An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers › Exercise 3.5.6 (Comparison of the classes of $ax^2 + bxy +cy^2$ and $ax^2 - bxy +cy^2$)
Exercise 3.5.6 (Comparison of the classes of $ax^2 + bxy +cy^2$ and $ax^2 - bxy +cy^2$)
Let and . These forms represent precisely the same numbers, but they are not necessarily equivalent (because the determinant of the transformation has determinant ). Show that is equivalent to , but that and are not equivalent.
Answers
For compatibility with other authors, I write “properly equivalent” where N.Z.M. say “equivalent”.
Proof. Put and . Then is not a reduced form. The algorithm of reduction gives , where . Explicitly,
This shows that is properly equivalent to .
The forms and are two reduced forms, and are positive definite. By Section 3.7, in this case, the reduced form in a given equivalence class is unique, so and are not properly equivalent.
The direct proof is cumbersome: assume that there is some such that . Then
Therefore
The first equation gives by completing the square
Thus , so .
The third equation gives
Then , thus . If , then . This is impossible, so . Then , and is impossible, thus (and ).
Then the second equation with gives , where , thus . The only matrices such that are
Then , so . This shows that and are not properly equivalent. □