Homepage › Solution manuals › Ivan Niven › An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers › Exercise 5.3.3 (Pythagorean triples in arithmetic or geometric progression)

Exercise 5.3.3 (Pythagorean triples in arithmetic or geometric progression)

Find all Pythagorean triples whose terms form (a) an arithmetic progression, (b) a geometric progression.

Answers

Proof. Let ( x , y , z ) ∈ ℤ 3 be a Pythagorean triple, so that x 2 + y 2 = z 2 .

(a)
if x , y , z form an arithmetic progression, then y = x + z 2 . Thus ( x , z ) is solution of x 2 + ( x + z 2 ) 2 = z 2 .

Then

0 = 4 x 2 + ( x + z ) 2 − 4 z 2 = 5 x 2 + 2 xy − 3 z 2 = ( 5 x − 3 z ) ( x + z ) .

Therefore x + z = 0 or 5 x − 3 z = 0 .

If x + z = 0 , then y = 0 , and ( x , y , z ) = ( − a , 0 , a ) for some a ∈ ℤ , where ( − a , 0 , a ) are indeed Pythagorean triples.

If 5 x − 3 z = 0 , then 3 ∣ 5 x , where 3 ∧ 5 = 1 , thus 3 ∣ x . There is some a ∈ ℤ such that x = 3 a . Therefore 3 z = 15 a , z = 5 a , and y = ( x + z ) ∕ 2 = 4 a , so

( x , y , z ) = ( 3 a , 4 a , 5 a ) ,

which are Pythagorean triples. The Pythagorean triples whose terms form an arithmetic progression are

( − a , 0 , a ) , ( 3 a , 4 a , 5 a ) , a ∈ ℤ ,

so are integers multiples of the primitive triples ( − 1 , 0 , 1 ) or ( 3 , 4 , 5 ) .

(b)
If x , y , z form an geometric progression, then y 2 = xz . Thus ( x , z ) is solution of x 2 + xz − z 2 = 0 .

If z = 0 , then x = 0 and y = 0 , so ( x , y , z ) = ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) .

if z ≠ 0 , then

( x z ) 2 + x z − 1 . (1)

But the roots of the polynomial X 2 + X − 1 are ( − 1 − 5 ) ∕ 2 and ( − 1 − 5 ) ∕ 2 , which are irrational numbers. Therefore x ∕ z cannot be solution of (1).

Apart the trivial solution ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) , there is no Pythagorean triple whose terms form a geometric progression.

(I let Byzantine doctors discuss on the fact that ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) form a geometric progression or not.)

□

Note: the answer p. 518 gives also ( 4 k , 3 k , 5 k ) as solution for part (a), but ( 4 , 3 , 5 ) is not an arithmetic progression.

User profile picture
2025-04-04 09:48
Comments