Homepage › Solution manuals › Ivan Niven › An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers › Exercise 5.4.14* (Equations $x^4 + 4y^4 = z^2$ and $a^4 + b^2 = c^4$)
Exercise 5.4.14* (Equations $x^4 + 4y^4 = z^2$ and $a^4 + b^2 = c^4$)
Construct a descent argument that relates the two equations . Deduce that neither of these equations has a solution in positive integers.
Answers
Proof.
- (a)
-
Assume for the sake of contradiction that the equation
has a solution in positive integers, so that . Then there is a solution where is minimal, given by
The equation (1) shows that and are both even or both odd. If and are both even, then for some integers . Then , thus , so is a solution of (1) in positive integers, with . This contradicts the minimality of , thus and are odd.
If some prime number divides and , then , and , thus . Then , therefore . This shows that is a solution of the same equation, satisfying , and this contradicts the minimality of . Therefore , so is a primitive Pythagorean triple, with even. By Theorem 5.5, there are integers of opposite parity such that and
Since , where are relatively prime (and ), then for some positive integer (Lemma 5.4), so
Put . Then
where , and have opposite parity, and , so .
Then is a primitive Pythagorean triple with odd (since is odd). The same Theorem 5.5 shows that there are integers of opposite parity such that and
Since , by Problem 5, or for suitable positive integers . In both cases, the last equation of (4) gives
thus is a solution of (1) in positive integers. But , and this contradicts the minimality of . This contradiction shows that has no solution in positive integers.
- (b)
-
It remains to show that
has no solution in positive integers. If this equation has a solution, there is a solution
where
is minimal.
We prove . Indeed if a prime divides and , then , thus . Then is a solution of (4) with . This contradicts the minimality of . This contradiction shows that . Therefore is a primitive Pythagorean triple. By Theorem 5.5, there are integers of opposite parity such that and
- If (7.a) is true, we obtain as previously integers such that or , so (see (6)), and this is impossible by the first part of the proof.
-
If (7.b) is true, note that satisfy the system
From (8) we obtain
where and are odd and relatively prime, and . Therefore there is some positive integer such that
By the first equation of (9), this gives
thus
Note that and imply . From and , we see that . This shows that is a primitive Pythagorean triple. By Theorem 5.5, there are positive integers of opposite parity such that and
In either cases we have
Then the second equation of (9) gives, after division by ,
Since are of opposite parity, is odd, and . By Lemma 5.4, and are perfect squares, say
Then
This shows that is a solution of our equation . Moreover , thus , where , so . This contradicts the minimality of . This contradiction proves that has no solution in positive integers.
(*) Carmichael, in “Diophantine Analysis”, shows that this system has no positive integers solutions : I use some of his arguments in the context of our descent proof.