Homepage › Solution manuals › James Munkres › Topology › Exercise 10.3
Exercise 10.3
Both and are well-ordered in the dictionary order. Do they have the same order type?
Answers
We claim that they do not have the same order type, which we show presently.
Proof. First, clearly is the smallest element of both ordered sets. For brevity let , , and and be the corresponding dictionary orderings, with being the normal ordering of .
So assume that they do have the same order type so that there is an order-preserving bijection . Consider , which is clearly not the smallest element since . Let , which cannot be the smallest element of since preserves order, so that . Clearly so that or . In the former cases we must have that so that . So set . In the latter case set . It is easy to see, and trivial to formally show, that is the immediate predecessor of in either case.
Now let , noting that is an order-preserving bijection from to since is an order-preserving bijection. It then follows that since . If then it has to be that so that (because ) since there is no where . Thus for some . We then have that so that clearly . From this we have, , which contradicts the fact that is the immediate predecessor of . So it has to be that they do not have the same order type. □
It is worth noting that, in the theory of ordinal numbers, has order type whereas has simply order type . This also shows that and have different order types since distinct ordinal numbers always have different order types.