Exercise 11.6

A collection A of subsets of a set X is said to be of finite type provided that a subset B of X belongs to A if and only if every finite subset of B belongs to A. Show that the Kuratowski lemma implies the following:

Lemma (Tukey, 1940). Let A be a collection of sets. If A is of finite type, then A has an element properly contained in no other element of A.

Answers

Proof. Suppose that A is a collection of sets of finite type. Let B be a subcollection of A that is simply ordered by . Consider next any finite subset B of B. Then, for every b B, b B so that we can choose a set Bb B such that b Bb. Note that this does not require the choice axiom since we need to make only a finite number of choices. Then the set B = {Bbb B} is clearly a finite set of elements of B. Since B is simply ordered by , it follows that B is as well and so has a largest element C since it is finite.

Hence, for any b B, we have that b Bb C so that b C, and so B is a finite subset of C. Since C B and B A, clearly C A. Since A is of finite type and B is a finite subset of C, it follows that B A also. Since B was an arbitrary finite subset of B, it then follows that B is also in A since it is of finite type. It then follows from the Kuratowski lemma (Exercise 11.5) that A has an element that is properly contained in no other element of A as desired. □

User profile picture
2019-12-01 00:00
Comments