Homepage › Solution manuals › James Munkres › Topology › Exercise 11.6
Exercise 11.6
A collection of subsets of a set is said to be of finite type provided that a subset of belongs to if and only if every finite subset of belongs to . Show that the Kuratowski lemma implies the following:
Lemma (Tukey, 1940). Let be a collection of sets. If is of finite type, then has an element properly contained in no other element of .
Answers
Proof. Suppose that is a collection of sets of finite type. Let be a subcollection of that is simply ordered by . Consider next any finite subset of . Then, for every , so that we can choose a set such that . Note that this does not require the choice axiom since we need to make only a finite number of choices. Then the set is clearly a finite set of elements of . Since is simply ordered by , it follows that is as well and so has a largest element since it is finite.
Hence, for any , we have that so that , and so is a finite subset of . Since and , clearly . Since is of finite type and is a finite subset of , it follows that also. Since was an arbitrary finite subset of , it then follows that is also in since it is of finite type. It then follows from the Kuratowski lemma (Exercise 11.5) that has an element that is properly contained in no other element of as desired. □