Exercise 16.2

If T and T are topologies on X and T is strictly finer than T, what can you say about the corresponding subspace topologies on the subset Y of X?

Answers

Let TY and TY be the subspace topologies on Y corresponding to T and T, respectively. We claim that TY is finer than TY but not necessarily strictly finer.

Proof. First, we have that

TY = {Y UU T} TY = {Y UU T}

by the definition of subspace topologies. So for any V TY we have that V = Y U where U T. Then also U T since T is finer than T. This shows that V TY since V = Y U where U T. Hence TY is finer than TY since V was arbitrary.

To show that it is not necessarily strictly finer, consider the sets X = {a,b,c} and Y = {a,b} so that clearly Y X. Consider also the topologies

T = {,X, {a,b}} T = {,X, {a,b}, {c}}

on X so that clearly T is strictly finer than T. This results in the subspace topologies

TY = {,Y } TY = {,Y },

which are clearly the same so that TY is not strictly finer than TY , noting that it is technically still finer. However, if we instead have the topologies

T = {,X, {a,b}} T = {,X, {a,b}, {b}}

then

TY = {,Y } TY = {,Y, {b}}

so that TY is strictly finer than TY . Thus we can say nothing about the strictness of the relation of the subspace topologies. □

User profile picture
2019-12-01 00:00
Comments
  • Typo in line one. We claim that T_y^' is finer than T_y but not necessarily strictly finer.
    DysonSwarm2025-05-30