Homepage › Solution manuals › James Munkres › Topology › Exercise 16.2
Exercise 16.2
If and are topologies on and is strictly finer than , what can you say about the corresponding subspace topologies on the subset of ?
Answers
Let and be the subspace topologies on corresponding to and , respectively. We claim that is finer than but not necessarily strictly finer.
Proof. First, we have that
by the definition of subspace topologies. So for any we have that where . Then also since is finer than . This shows that since where . Hence is finer than since was arbitrary.
To show that it is not necessarily strictly finer, consider the sets and so that clearly . Consider also the topologies
on so that clearly is strictly finer than . This results in the subspace topologies
which are clearly the same so that is not strictly finer than , noting that it is technically still finer. However, if we instead have the topologies
then
so that is strictly finer than . Thus we can say nothing about the strictness of the relation of the subspace topologies. □
Comments
-
Typo in line one. We claim that T_y^' is finer than T_y but not necessarily strictly finer.DysonSwarm • 2025-05-30