Homepage › Solution manuals › James Munkres › Topology › Exercise 17.17
Exercise 17.17
Consider the lower limit topology on and the topology given by the basis of Exercise 8 of §13. Determine the closures of the intervals and in these two topologies.
Answers
Recall that from Exercise 13.8, noting that it was shown there that this basis generates a topology different from the lower limit topology. Denote the lower limit topology by , and denote the topology generated by by .
Proof. First let and so that we must show that .
Consider any .
Case: . Consider any basis element that contains so that . Let so that since both and . Then of course there is a real between and so that . Thus we have so that . Also so that . Hence intersects so that by Theorem 17.5 part (b) since was an arbitrary basis element.
Case: . Then it has to be that so that since obviously .
This shows that since was arbitrary.
Now consider any real where so that either or . If then the basis element clearly contains but does not intersect . If then the basis element contains and does not intersect . Either way, it follows from Theorem 17.5 part (b) that . Since was arbitrary, the contrapositive shows that . □
Proof. Let . Consider any real , and we shall consider an exhaustive list of cases that will show whether or .
Case: . Obviously, there is a rational where since the rationals are unbounded below. Similarly, there is a rational where since the rationals are order-dense in the reals. The set is then clearly a basis element of that contains . It is also trivial to show that does not intersect since , which shows that by Theorem 17.5 part (b) whether is rational or not.
Case: . Consider any basis element (where and are rational) that contains so that . Let so that since both and . Then of course there is a real between and so that . Thus we have so that . Also so that . Hence intersects so that by Theorem 17.5 part (b) since was an arbitrary basis element. Note that this is true whether or not is rational.
Case: . Then clearly so that since obviously .
Case: .
-
Case: is rational. Then there is another rational where since the rationals are unbounded above. Then clearly the set is a basis element of that contains . Also clearly does not intersect since implies that and hence . This shows that by Theorem 17.5 part (b).
Case: is irrational. Then consider any basis element containing so that and are rational. Thus , but since is rational but is not, it has to be that . Let so that since both and . There is then a real where so that and hence . Also so that also . Therefore and intersect, which shows that by Theorem 17.5 part (b) since was arbitrary.
Case: . Then there are clearly rationals and where and . Then clearly the set is a basis element that contains and does not intersect . This of course shows that by Theorem 17.5 part (b) again, noting that this is true regardless of the rationality of .
These cases taken together show the desired results. □
Main Problem.
First, it follows directly from Lemma 1 that that and in . It is worth noting that and are both basis elements of , which is interesting since they are closures and therefore closed. This of course implies that basis elements in are both open and closed, which is indeed the case and is easy to see after a little thought.
It also follows directly from Lemma 2 that and in since is irrational and is rational.