Homepage › Solution manuals › James Munkres › Topology › Exercise 21.6
Exercise 21.6
Define by the equation . Show that the sequence converges for each , but that the sequence does not converge uniformly.
Answers
First, we build up a little more theory
Definition 1. Let be a sequence of functions from a set to topological space . We say that the sequence of functions converges pointwise to a function if the sequence converges to for every .
Lemma 1. Let be a sequence of functions from a set to topological space . If is a Hausdorff space and converges pointwise to , then is unique.
Proof. Suppose that converges pointwise to two distinct functions and . Since they are distinct, there is an where . But then the sequence converges to both of the distinct points and since converges pointwise to both and . As is Hausdorff, this violates Theorem 17.10 so that can only converge pointwise to a unique function. □
Lemma 2. Let be a sequence of functions from a set to metric space with metric . If converges uniformly to a function , then it also converges pointwise to .
Proof. Suppose that converges uniformly to and consider any and . Then there is an where for all and . Then, since , we have for all since then . This shows that the sequence converges to since was arbitrary. Since was arbitrary, this shows that converges pointwise to as desired. □
Main Problem.
Proof. First we show that the sequence converges pointwise to the function defined by
for . This of course shows that converges for each by Definition 1 .
So consider any such so that we have the following exhaustive cases:
Case: . Then for any . Thus clearly the sequence converges to .
Case: . Somewhat similarly we have for every so that clearly the sequence converges to .
Case: . Here we show that, for any , that the sequence is strictly decreasing and that it is bounded below by . We prove this using induction on . So first for we have
For the inductive step suppose that and . Then we of course have so that clearly as well since . We also clearly have
which completes the inductive step.
Hence the sequence is strictly decreasing (and therefore of course non-increasing) and bounded below by zero, from which it follows that it converges by a theorem analogous in an obvious way to that shown in Exercise 21.11 part (a). So suppose that the sequence converges to the value . Then of course also the sequence must also converge to . Thus we have
where we note that clearly the function for is clearly continuous so that
by Theorem 21.3. Therefore we have so that it would be that if were any nonzero value. However, we know that so it must be that . This completes the proof that converges pointwise to .
It then becomes fairly easy to show that does not converge uniformly. Consider any function . If then cannot converge pointwise to since it was shown to converge pointwise to above and is unique by Lemma 1 since is Hausdorff. Hence cannot converge uniformly to by the converse of Lemma 2 since it does even not converge pointwise. On the other hand if then clearly has a discontinuity at so that it is not continuous. However each is continuous on by elementary calculus. This shows that cannot converge uniformly to since this would violate Theorem 21.6. Therefore does converge uniformly to any function since was arbitrary. □