Exercise 21.6

Define fn : [0,1] by the equation fn(x) = xn. Show that the sequence (fn(x)) converges for each x [0,1], but that the sequence (fn) does not converge uniformly.

Answers

First, we build up a little more theory

Definition 1. Let fn : X Y be a sequence of functions from a set X to topological space Y . We say that the sequence of functions converges pointwise to a function f : X Y if the sequence (fn(x)) converges to f(x) for every x X.

Lemma 1. Let fn : X Y be a sequence of functions from a set X to topological space Y . If Y is a Hausdorff space and (fn) converges pointwise to f, then f is unique.

Proof. Suppose that (fn) converges pointwise to two distinct functions f and g. Since they are distinct, there is an x0 X where f(x0)g(x0). But then the sequence (fn(x0)) converges to both of the distinct points f(x0) and g(x0) since (fn) converges pointwise to both f and g. As Y is Hausdorff, this violates Theorem 17.10 so that (fn) can only converge pointwise to a unique function. □

Lemma 2. Let fn : X Y be a sequence of functions from a set X to metric space Y with metric d. If (fn) converges uniformly to a function f, then it also converges pointwise to f.

Proof. Suppose that (fn) converges uniformly to f and consider any x0 X and 𝜖 > 0. Then there is an N + where d(fn(x),f(x)) < 𝜖 for all n > N and x X. Then, since x0 X, we have d(fn(x0),f(x0)) < 𝜖 for all n N + 1 since then n > N. This shows that the sequence (fn(x0)) converges to f(x0) since 𝜖 was arbitrary. Since x0 was arbitrary, this shows that (fn) converges pointwise to f as desired. □

Main Problem.

Proof. First we show that the sequence (fn) converges pointwise to the function g : [0,1] defined by

g(x) = { 0x < 1 1 x = 1

for x [0,1]. This of course shows that (fn(x)) converges for each x [0,1] by Definition 1 .

So consider any such x [0,1] so that we have the following exhaustive cases:

Case: x = 0. Then fn(x) = xn = 0n = 0 for any n +. Thus clearly the sequence (fn(x)) = (0,0,) converges to 0.

Case: x = 1. Somewhat similarly we have fn(x) = xn = 1n = 1 for every n + so that clearly the sequence (fn(x)) = (1,1,) converges to 1.

Case: 0 < x < 1. Here we show that, for any x (0,1), that the sequence (fn(x)) is strictly decreasing and that it is bounded below by 0. We prove this using induction on n. So first for n = 1 we have

0 < x < 1 0 < x2 < x (since x > 0) 0 < f2(x) < f1(x) 0 < fn+1(x) < fn(x).

For the inductive step suppose that fn(x) > 0 and fn+1(x) < fn(x). Then we of course have 0 < fn(x) = xn so that clearly 0 = x 0 < x xn = xn+1 = fn+1(x) as well since x > 0. We also clearly have

fn+1 < fn(x) xn+1 < xn x xn+1 < x xn (since x > 0) xn+2 < xn+1 fn+2(x) < fn+1(x),

which completes the inductive step.

Hence the sequence is strictly decreasing (and therefore of course non-increasing) and bounded below by zero, from which it follows that it converges by a theorem analogous in an obvious way to that shown in Exercise 21.11 part (a). So suppose that the sequence converges to the value a. Then of course also the sequence (fn+1(x)) must also converge to a. Thus we have

a = lim nfn+1(x) = lim nxn+1 = lim nx xn = lim nxfn(x) = xlim nfn(x) = xa,

where we note that clearly the function h(y) = xy for y is clearly continuous so that

lim nxfn(x) = lim nh(fn(x)) = h (lim nfn(x)) = xlim nfn(x)

by Theorem 21.3. Therefore we have a = xa so that it would be that 1 = x if a were any nonzero value. However, we know that x < 1 so it must be that a = 0. This completes the proof that (fn) converges pointwise to g.

It then becomes fairly easy to show that (fn(x)) does not converge uniformly. Consider any function f : [0,1] . If fg then (fn) cannot converge pointwise to f since it was shown to converge pointwise to g above and g is unique by Lemma 1 since is Hausdorff. Hence (fn) cannot converge uniformly to f by the converse of Lemma 2 since it does even not converge pointwise. On the other hand if f = g then clearly f = g has a discontinuity at 1 so that it is not continuous. However each fn(x) = xn is continuous on [0,1] by elementary calculus. This shows that (fn) cannot converge uniformly to f = g since this would violate Theorem 21.6. Therefore (fn) does converge uniformly to any function since f was arbitrary. □

User profile picture
2019-12-01 00:00
Comments