Exercise 22.4

(a)
Define an equivalence relation on the plane X = 2 as follows:
x0 × y0 x1 × y1ifx0 + y02 = x 1 + y12.

Let X be the corresponding quotient space. It is homeomorphic to a familiar space; what is it?

(b)
Repeat (a) for the equivalence relation
x0 × y0 x1 × y1ifx02 + y 02 = x 12 + y 12.

Answers

Solution for (a). Set g(x × y) = x + y2 . We see it is a surjection onto since ×{0}. It is continuous since for x0 × y0 X, given 𝜖 > 0, letting δ = min (1,𝜖2(|y0| + 1)), ρ(x0 × y0,x × y) < δ implies

|g(x0 × y0) g(x × y)| = |(x0 + y02) (x + y2)| |x0 x| + |y02 y2| |x0 x| + |y0 + y||y0 y| |x0 x| + |y y0|2 + 2|y 0||y0 y| < 2(|y0| + 1)δ < 𝜖.

If we define f : X by xx × 0, which is continuous since (a,b) × (c,d) maps back to (a,b) which is open in , we see g f is the identity on , and so g is a quotient map by the lemma above. Since x0 × y0 x1 × y1g(x0 × y0) = g(x1 × y1), by Corollary 22.3, this induces a bijective continuous map g: X , which is a homeomorphism since g was a quotient map. □

Solution for (b). Set g(x × y) = x2 + y2 . We see it is a surjection onto 0, since ×{0}0, and it does not map to anything else since x2 + y2 0 for all x,y. It is continuous since for x0 × y0 X, given 𝜖 > 0, letting δ = min (1,𝜖2(|y0| + |x0| + 1)), ρ(x0 × y0,x × y) < δ implies

|g(x0 × y0) g(x × y)| = |(x02 + y 02) (x2 + y2)| |x02 x2| + |y 02 y2| |x0 x||x x0 + 2x0| + |y0 y||y y0 + 2y0| |x0 x|(1 + 2|x0|) + |y0 y|(1 + 2|y0|) 2δ(|x0| + |y0| + 1) < 𝜖.

We define f : 0 X by xx × 0, which is continuous since the preimage of (a,b) × (c,d), if (c,d) 0, is the open set 0 (a,b), where a = a2 if a 0, and 1 otherwise, and similarly for b (we chose 1 out of convenience; we really only have to make sure the preimage is a half-open set [0,b) or the empty set in these cases); if (c,d)0, then the preimage would be empty. We then see g f is the identity on 0, and so g is a quotient map by the lemma above. Since x0 × y0 x1 × y1g(x0 × y0) = g(x1 × y1), by Corollary 22.3, this induces a bijective continuous map g: X 0, which is a homeomorphism since g was a quotient map. □

User profile picture
2021-12-21 18:46
Comments

(a) Two points in the plane are in the same equivalence class if x + y2 have the same value, say c. Then we have that x + y2 = c and hence x = c y2, which is the equation for horizontally-oriented parabola opening to the left and shifted in x by c. A few of these parabolic equivalence classes are shown below for various values of c:

Then, if X is the quotient space induced, by this equivalence relation, then each element of X is one of these equivalence classes. We claim that this space is homeomorphic to .

Proof. So define f : X as follows: if U is an equivalence class (so that U X) containing x × y then set f(U) = x + y2, noting that clearly f(U) . We also note that if x0 × y0 and x1 × y1 are both in the equivalence class X then x0 + y02 = x1 + y12 so that f(X) = x0 + y02 = x1 + y12 is well defined.

Now suppose that U0 and U1 are two distinct equivalence classes and that x0 × y0 U0 and x1 × y1 U1. It then follows that it is not true that x0 × y0 x1 × y1 so that x0 + y02x1 + y12. Thus we have f(U0) = x0 + y02x1 + y12 = f(U1), which shows that f is injective. Next consider any real c and, the point c × 0 in the plane, and let U be the equivalence class containing c × 0, which must exist since the equivalence classes form a partition of the plane. Then we have f(U) = c + 02 = c, which shows that f is surjective since c was arbitrary. This completes the proof that f is a bijection, noting that of course this means that f1 is also a bijective function.

Now, the standard topology of of course can have different bases, but we will concern ourselves with the order topology basis first. So consider any basis element B = (a,b) of in the order topology. Clearly then the inverse image of B is the collection U of equivalence classes U where a < f(U) < b. Then the union of all the sets in U is the set of points in the plane x × y where a < x + y2 < b. An illustration of such a subset of the plane is illustrated below for a = 2 and b = 3:

It is easy to see that such a set is open in 2 for any a and b, which we shall not show formally. Thus U is an open subset of X, which suffices to show that f is continuous.

Now, to show that f1 is continuous we utilize metric topology bases for both 2 and , which we know induce the standard topologies on those sets. In particular, we use the standard metric d on but use the square metric ρ on 2, which induces the standard topology on 2 by Theorem 20.3. Recall that the square metric is defined by

ρ(x0 × y0,x1 × y1) = max { |x0 x1| , |y0 y1|} .

So consider any x , let U be the equivalence class in X such that U = f1(x) so that f(U) = x, and let U be a neighborhood of U = f1(x) in the quotient topology on X. Then we have that U is a collection of equivalence classes and that x × 0 must be in U since x + 02 = x = f(U). Clearly also the union A = UUU is then open in 2 since U is open in the quotient space, and x × 0 A since x × 0 U and U U. Thus by Lemma 20.4.1 there is a δ > 0 where Bρ(x × 0,δ) A.

Now, consider the set Bd(x,δ), which is clearly a neighborhood of x in . Consider any V f1(Bd(x,δ)) and let v = f(V ) so that it must be that v × 0 V since v + 02 = v = f(V ). Then v = f(V ) Bd(x,δ) so that d(v,x) = |v x| < δ. Since we have |v x| 0 = |0 0|, it follows that

ρ(v × 0,x × 0) = max { |v x|, |0 0|} = |v x| < δ,

and hence v × 0 Bρ(x × 0,δ) A = UUU. Therefore there is an equivalence class W in U such that v × 0 W and W U. However, since the equivalence classes are all disjoint, it has to be that W = V since v × 0 V as well. Thus V = W U so that f1(Bd(x,δ)) U since V was arbitrary. This suffices to show that f1 is continuous by Theorem 18.1 since U was an arbitrary neighborhood of U = f1(x). This completes the proof that f is a homeomorphism so that X is homeomorphic to as desired. □

(b) Here two points are in the same equivalence class if x2 + y2 have the same value, say c. Then we have that the equivalence class is all the points in the plane such that x2 + y2 = c, which is clearly a circle in the plane with radius c centered at the origin, noting that of course always c = x2 + y2 0. We also note that the only point such that x2 + y2 = 0 is 0 × 0 itself, so this the only point in its equivalence class. We claim that the quotient topology on the set of equivalence classes X is homeomorphic to the subspace topology of nonnegative reals, i.e. the subspace A = {x x 0} of .

Proof. Taking a similar approach to that in part (a), define f : X A by f(U) = x × y = x2 + y2 if x × y is a point in the equivalence class U. Clearly we have f(U) 0 so that f(U) A. It also follows that f is well-defined since, if x0 × y0 and x1 × y1 are two points in the same equivalence class U, then f(U) = x0 2 + y0 2 = x1 2 + y1 2 since x02 + y02 = x12 + y12.

Now, if U0 and U1 are two distinct equivalence classes and x0 × y0 U0 and x1 × y1 U1 then it is not true that x0 × y0 x1 × y1 so that f(U0) = x0 2 + y0 2x1 2 + y1 2 = f(U1) since x02 + y02x12 + y12 and the square root function is injective on the nonnegative reals. This shows that f is injective. Also, if c is any element of A then let U be the equivalence class containing c × 0, which exists since the classes form a partition on the plane. Then we have f(U) = c2 + 02 = |c| = c since c 0, which shows that f is surjective since c was arbitrary. Hence f is a bijection so that of course f1 is also a bijective function.

Next, consider the order topology basis of and any corresponding basis element B of the subspace A. Then clearly either B = [0,b) (since then, for example, B = A (1,b) and (1,b) is clearly a basis element of ) or B = (a,b) for some 0 a < b. In the former case clearly f1(B) is the collection U of equivalence classes U such that 0 f(U) < b, the union of which is clearly the set of points x × y in the plane such that x2 + y2 < b, which is an open filled circle of radius b centered at the origin. This is obviously an open set of 2. In the later case clearly f1(B) is the collection U of equivalence classes U such that a < f(U) < b, the union of which is the set of points in the plane x × y such that a < x2 + y2 < b. As this is clearly an open annular ring centered at the origin, it is open in 2. Hence in either case the union of the collection U is open in 2 so that U = f1(B) is an open subset of X. Since B was an arbitrary basis element of A, this shows that f is continuous.

Similar to what was done in part (a), we show that f1 is also continuous by utilizing the euclidean metric d on 2 and the standard metric d on A, i.e. d is the standard metric d on restricted to A × A, which is a metric for the subspace A by the remarks at the beginning of §21. So consider any x A so that x 0, let U be the equivalence class in X such that U = f1(x) so that f(U) = x, and let U be a neighborhood of U = f1(x) in the quotient topology on X. Then we have that U is a collection of equivalence classes and that x × 0 must be in U since x2 + 02 = |x| = x = f(U). Clearly also the union C = UUU is then open in 2 since U is open in the quotient space, and x × 0 C since x × 0 U and U U. Thus by Lemma 20.4.1 there is a δ > 0 where Bd(x × 0,δ) C.

Now, consider the set Bd(x,δ), which is clearly a neighborhood of x in A. Consider any V f1(Bd(x,δ)) and let v = f(V ) A so that it must be that v × 0 V since v2 + 02 = |v| = v = f(V ). Then v = f(V ) Bd(x,δ) so that d(v,x) = d(v,x) = |v x| < δ. Then also

d(v × 0,x × 0) = (z x)2 + (0 0)2 = (z x)2 = |v x| < δ,

and hence v × 0 Bd(x × 0,δ) C = UUU. Therefore there is an equivalence class W in U such that v × 0 W and W U. However, since the equivalence classes are all disjoint, it has to be that W = V since v × 0 V as well. Thus V = W U so that f1(Bd(x,δ)) U since V was arbitrary. This suffices to show that f1 is continuous by Theorem 18.1 since U was an arbitrary neighborhood of U = f1(x). This completes the proof that f is a homeomorphism so that X is homeomorphic to A as desired. □

User profile picture
2019-12-01 00:00
Comments