Homepage › Solution manuals › James Munkres › Topology › Exercise 3.14
Exercise 3.14
If is a relation on a set , define a new relation on by letting if .
- (a)
- Show that is symmetric if and only if .
- (b)
- Show that if is an order relation, is also an order relation.
- (c)
- Prove the converse of the theorem in Exercise 13.
Answers
- (a)
-
Proof. Suppose that is symmetric. Then we simply have
which shows that .
Now suppose that and consider any . Then by definition. Hence also since , which shows that is symmetric. □
- (b)
-
Proof. Suppose that is an order relation. Since clearly, is a relation on , we need only show that it has the three required properties:
- (Comparability) Consider any distinct so that or since has comparability. Hence either or , respectively, by definition so that and are comparable in as well.
- (Nonreflexivity) Consider any . Then since it is nonreflexive, thus also since, if it were, it would also be that by definition. Hence is also nonreflexive since was arbitrary.
- (Transitivity) Suppose that and . Then by definition, we have and . That is, and so that since is transitive. Therefore by definition, which shows that is also transitive.
- (c)
- The converse follows from an argument directly analogous to the proof of
Exercise 3.13, which we give here for completeness.
Proof. Suppose that has the greatest lower bound property and that is any nonempty subset of that is bounded above so that is an upper lower bound of . Let be the set of upper bounds of so that is nonempty since . Since is nonempty there is an . Now, for any we have that is an upper bound of so that , which shows that is a lower bound of . Hence is a nonempty subset of that is bounded below, and so has a greatest lower bound since has the greatest lower bound property. We claim that is also the least upper bound of .
Consider any and any . Then is an upper bound of so that since . Since was arbitrary, this shows that is a lower bound of . Thus we have since is the greatest lower bound of . Since was arbitrary, this shows that is an upper bound of . If is any other upper bound then so that since is a lower bound of . Since was an arbitrary upper bound, this shows that in fact, is the least upper bound of . Hence also has the least upper bound property since the nonempty subset was arbitrary. □