Homepage › Solution manuals › James Munkres › Topology › Exercise 4.11
Exercise 4.11
Given , we say that is even if , and is odd otherwise.
- (a)
- Show that if is odd, for some . [Hint: Choose so that .]
- (b)
- Show that if and are odd, so are and , for any .
- (c)
- Show that if is rational, then for some where not both and are even. [Hint: Let be the smallest element of the set .]
- (d)
- Theorem: is irrational.
Answers
Proof. Suppose that so that , which violates Corollary ?? since . Thus it has to be that . From this it immediately follows that by simply subtracting 1 from both sides of the previous inequality. □
Proof. Supposing that is even, then . Then clearly .
Now suppose that for some integer . Then clearly is an integer so that is even by definition. □
Proof. Suppose that is odd so that for some integer (this is shown in part (a) below, which does not depend on this lemma). Then
noting that clearly is an integer since is. Hence is odd again by what will be shown in part (a).
We prove this by contrapositive, so suppose that is not odd so that it must be even. Therefore for some integer by Lemma 2 . Then so that is even since clearly is an integer since is. Thus is not odd. □
Main Problem.
- (a)
- Here we show the converse as well, i.e. we show that
is odd if
and only if
for some .
Proof. Suppose that is odd so that by definition . It then follows from Exercise 4.9 part (b) that there is a unique integer such that . We then have that since obviously . Hence by Lemma 1 we have that and also . Therefore it has to be that as desired.
Now suppose that there is an such that . Then we have that
We then clearly have that since so that cannot be an integer by Corollary ?? . Hence is odd by definition. □
- (b)
-
Proof. Suppose that and are odd so that and for some by part (a). We then have that
so that is odd by what was shown in part (a) since clearly by Exercise 4.5 since and are integers.
Now we show by induction on that is odd for any . First, for we clearly have is odd by supposition. Then, if we assume that is odd, we have that the product is odd as well by what was just shown since both and are odd. This completes the induction. □
- (c)
-
Proof. Suppose that is rational. Then for some integers and . Clearly it cannot be that , and if then for some . Then we have so that . Furthermore, since and are both positive, we have that is positive by Exercise 4.2 part (h). Thus clearly since .
Now, let . Since we just showed that and it follows that . Since clearly and is nonempty (since ), it has a smallest element by the well-ordering property. Letting , we clearly have that since . Then, we have , noting again that .
To show that not both and are even, suppose to the contrary that they are both even. Then by Lemma 2 we have that and for some . Clearly then and so that both and are positive by Exercise 4.2 part (h) since and (and ) are. Hence . We have so that , which implies that since and are both in . However, we also have that since , which contradicts the fact that is the smallest element of . Thus it has to be the case that not both and are even. □
- (d)
- This is one of the most famous proofs in all of mathematics, and is often used
as an example of mathematical proofs since it can be understood by most
laymen.
Proof. Obviously we take to be the unique positive real number such that as was shown to exist in Exercise 4.10. Suppose to the contrary that is rational so that for where not both and are even by part (c) since . We therefore have that so that . Since is an integer (clearly, since is and ) it follows from Lemma 2 that is even. This means that itself is even by Lemma 3 . Hence for some integer so that . From before, we then have so that clearly , from which it follows as before that and therefore itself is even by Lemmas 2 and 3 . However, this is a contradiction since we previously established that and cannot both be even! So it has to be that is not rational and is therefore irrational as desired. □