Exercise 4.4

(a)
Prove by induction that given n +, every nonempty subset of {1,,n} has a largest element.
(b)
Explain why you cannot conclude from (a) that every nonempty subset of + has a largest element.

Answers

(a)

Proof. Let A be the set of integers for which the hypothesis is true. Clearly, the result is then true if we can prove that A = +. So first, clearly 1 A since the set {1} has only a single nonempty subset, i.e. {1} itself, in which 1 is clearly the largest element. Now suppose that n A so that every nonempty subset of Sn+1 = {1,,n} has a largest element. Consider any nonempty subset B of Sn+2 = {1,,n + 1}, noting that Sn+2 = Sn+1 {n + 1}.

Case: n + 1 B. Then, for any other k B, k Sn+2 so that either k = n + 1 or k Sn+1 so that k < n + 1 by the definition of Sn+1. Thus in either case k n + 1 so that n + 1 is the largest element of B since k was arbitrary.

Case: n + 1B. Then clearly B Sn+1 so that B has a largest element by the induction hypothesis since B is nonempty.

Hence in either case B has a largest element so that n + 1 A since B was an arbitrary nonempty subset of Sn+2 = {1,,n + 1}. This shows that A is an inductive set of positive integers so that A = +, as desired by the Principle of Induction. □

(b)
There could be nonempty subsets of + that are not subsets of Sn+1 = {1,,n} for any n +, in which cases the hypothesis of part (a) is not satisfied so that the conclusion does not necessarily apply. In fact, + itself is an example of such a setting where both the hypothesis and the conclusion are false.
User profile picture
2019-12-01 00:00
Comments