Homepage › Solution manuals › James Munkres › Topology › Exercise 6.1
Exercise 6.1
- (a)
- Make a list of all the injective maps
Show that none is bijective. (This constitutes a direct proof that a set of cardinality three does not have cardinality four.)
- (b)
- How many injective maps
are there? (You can see why one would not wish to try to prove directly that there is no bijective correspondence between these sets.)
Answers
Lemma 1. The number of injective mappings (i.e. the cardinality of the set of injective functions) from to , where , is equal to the number of -permutations of , which is
Proof. We fix and show this for all by induction. First, for , the domain of the mappings is simply so that we need only choose a single element to which to map . Since there are elements to choose from (since the range is ) there are clearly
mappings, all of which are trivially injective.
Now suppose that and that there are injective mappings from to . Consider any such mapping . Since this mapping is injective, each is unique so that it uses of the available numbers in . Thus there are numbers to choose from to which to set so that the mapping is still injective. Hence for each injective mapping there are injective mappings from to . Since there are such mappings by the induction hypothesis, the total number of mappings from to will be
which completes the induction. □
Main Problem.
(a) Here we have and in Lemma 1 so that we expect injective mappings. Since the domain of each is a section of the positive integers, these maps can be written simply as 3-tuples. They are enumerated below:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
Note that they are all injective since no number is used more than once in each tuple. Also, none are surjective since it is easily verified that there is always an element of
that is not in each tuple. Thus none are a bijection since they are not surjective.
(b) Here we have and in Lemma 1 so that there are injective mappings. That is nearly two million! Certainly, direct proof would be unfeasible by hand but could be done by computer fairly easily.