Homepage › Solution manuals › James Munkres › Topology › Exercise 6.5
Exercise 6.5
If is finite, does it follow that and are finite?
Answers
We claim that in general, this does not follow.
Proof. As a counterexample, let and . Clearly, is infinite by Corollary 6.4 so that not both and are finite. It also follows from Exercise 5.3 part (c) that since is empty. Hence clearly is finite. □
If we add the additional stipulation that both and are nonempty, then the statement becomes true.
Proof. Since is finite there is a bijective function for some . We then show that is finite by first constructing an injective function from to . Since , there is a . So, for any , set , which is clearly in so that is a function from to . Now consider and in where . Then clearly . This shows that is injective since and were arbitrary.
We then have that the composition is an injective function from to by Exercise 2.4 part (b) since is injective as well (since it is a bijection). Therefore is finite by Corollary 6.7. An analogous argument uses the fact that to show that is also finite. □