Homepage › Solution manuals › James Munkres › Topology › Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.4
- (a)
- A real number
is said to be algebraic (over the rationals) if it satisfies some polynomial
equation of positive degree
with rational coefficients . Assuming that each polynomial equation has only finitely many roots, show that the set of algebraic numbers is countable.
- (b)
- A real number is said to be transcendental if it is not algebraic. Assuming the reals are uncountable, show that the transcendental numbers are uncountable. (It is a somewhat surprising fact that only two transcendental numbers are familiar to us: and . Even proving these two numbers transcendental is highly nontrivial.)
Answers
(a)
Proof. First consider arbitrary degree . Then for each , there is a corresponding polynomial equation in :
which is assumed to have a finite number of solutions. So let be the finite set of real numbers that are solutions. (We note that the polynomial corresponding to the vector becomes so that any real number satisfies it. Similarly the polynomial corresponding to for nonzero corresponds to the equation , which has no solutions. Of course, is still finite in this case. For the infinite-solution case, we could simply remove the zero vector from without changing the argument in any substantial way. This is also taken care of if we really do assume that any polynomial has a finite number of solutions as we are evidently doing here.)
Now, we clearly have that is countable by Theorem 7.6 since it is a finite product of countable sets (since it was shown in Exercise 7.1 that is countable). Thus the set is countable by Theorem 7.5 since it is a countable union of finite (and therefore countable) sets. Of course, this is the set of all algebraic numbers from polynomials of degree . Then is the set of all algebraic numbers, which is also then countable by Theorem 7.5 since each was shown to be countable. □
(b)
Proof. As in part (a), let be the set of algebraic numbers so that clearly, by definition, is the set of transcendental numbers. Note that clearly so that, if were countable, then would be too since it is a finite union of countable sets. This of course contradicts the (hitherto unproven) fact that is uncountable so it must be that is also uncountable as desired. □