Homepage › Solution manuals › James Munkres › Topology › Exercise 7.7
Answers
Throughout what follows let denote the set of all functions from set to set .
Lemma 1. If there is an injection from to with , and an injection from to , then there is also an injection from to .
Proof. Since , there is an . Since we know they exist, let and be injections. We construct an injection . So, for any , define , where is defined by
for , noting that is a function with domain since it is injective.
To show that is injective, consider where . Then there is a where . Let so that clearly and . Then clearly
since and is injective. Thus , which shows that is injective since and were arbitrary. □
Proof. We construct a bijection . So, for any , we have that . Define by for any , where is defined by . Then assign .
To show that is injective, consider where . Then there is a where . Also let , , , and . Then, by definition, we have so that . From this, it follows that , which shows that is injective since and were arbitrary.
Now consider any and any . Let , and then assign . Clearly then so that . So let and consider any . Let and so that by the definition of . Consider any so that by the definition of . Since was arbitrary, this shows that . Since was also arbitrary, this shows that . Lastly, since was arbitrary, this shows that is surjective. □
Main Problem.
Recall that we have and , where we let . We show that these have the same cardinality.
Proof. First consider any . Then define for so that clearly . Now define the function by . It is then trivial to show that is an injection.
Now, for , define and when and . Clearly then , and it is easily shown that the function defined by is an injection from to Also clearly the identity function on is an injection since it is a bijection. It then follows from Lemma 1 that there is an injection , noting that clearly .
We presently have that there is a bijection by Lemma 2 , which is of course also an injection. Finally, since has the same cardinality as (by Corollary 7.4), it follows that there is an injection from to . Since also the identity function on is an injection, we have again that there is an injection by Lemma 1 . Thus clearly then is an injection from to .
Therefore, since there is an injection from to as well as from to , it follows from Exercise 7.6 part (b) that and have the same cardinality as desired. □
Comments
-
The first sentence perhaps ought to read " ...all functions from B to A"ram555zz • 2024-11-14