Homepage › Solution manuals › James Munkres › Topology › Exercise 8.3
Answers
Regarding , defined the sequence by for every , which we could denote by . Then define as it is defined in Exercise 8.2, and we claim that this satisfies the inductive definition given in Exercise 4.6 and Example 8.2.
Proof. First, we clearly have . Next, for , we have
which shows that the inductive definition is satisfied. □
Since it does not seem to be given in the book thus far, we reiterate the typical inductive definition for :
Now, define the sequence by for . We then claim that defining as defined in Exercise 8.2 satisfies this definition.
Proof. First, we have . Then we also have
for so that the definition is clearly satisfied. □