Homepage › Solution manuals › James Munkres › Topology › Exercise 8.6
Exercise 8.6
- (a)
- Show that there is no function
satisfying the formula
Explain why this example does not violate the principle of recursive definition.
- (b)
- Consider the recursion formula
for .
Show that there exists a unique function satisfying this formula.
Answers
(a)
Proof. Suppose to the contrary that there is such a function . Then clearly and . Now, since , we clearly have . Thus so that is defined. However, we also have that since , and hence . We then have that
which is of course impossible since a square is always non-negative. This contradiction shows that such a function cannot exist. □
Note that this does not ostensibly violate the principle of recursive definition since is defined only in terms of values of less than for . However, were one to try to show the existence of rigorously using the principle, one would find that the required function would not be well-defined.
(b)
Proof. First, for any function , define
Consider any and any function . If then clearly so that is defined and positive. If then clearly is also defined and positive. Since and were arbitrary, this shows that is a well-defined function with range .
It then follows from the principle of recursive definition (Theorem 8.4) that there is a unique function such that
To see that this satisfies the recursion formula, clearly , and, for , we have
as desired.
To show that this function is unique, suppose that and both satisfy the recursive formula. We show by induction that for all so that clearly . First, obviously . Now suppose that for so that . Then, if then we have since and the roots are taken to be positive. Similarly, if , then . Thus in either case , which completes the induction. □