Homepage › Solution manuals › James Munkres › Topology › Exercise 9.3
Exercise 9.3
Suppose that is a set and is a given indexed family of injective functions
Show that is infinite. Can you define an injective function without using the choice axiom?
Answers
We defer the proof that is infinite until we define an injective , which we can do without using the choice axiom by using the principle of recursive definition.
Proof. First, let . Now consider any function . If then set . Otherwise let . Suppose for the moment that . Consider any so that there is a where . Then it has to be that since otherwise we would have . Since was arbitrary, this shows that . Thus the identity function is an injection. Clearly, is a surjection from to its image so that there is we can construct a particular injection by Corollary 6.7. Lastly, is an injection from to . Therefore is an injection from to . Hence is a bijection from to , which is clearly a subset of since is the range of . But, since , clearly as well so that is a bijection from onto a proper subset of itself. As is clearly finite, this violates Corollary 6.3 so we have a contradiction.
So it must be that so that it is a non-empty set of positive integers, and hence has a smallest element . So simply set . Now, it then follows from the principle of recursive definition that there is a unique such that
We claim that this is injective.
To see this we first show that for all . If we have that and so that clearly the result holds. If then for some since clearly so that . Since we have that as desired. This shows that is injective. For consider any where . Without loss of generality, we can assume that . Then clearly since since . However, by what was just shown, we have so that it has to be that . This shows to be injective since and were arbitrary.
Lastly, since is injective, it follows that is a bijection from to . Hence is infinite since is, and since it is a subset of , it has to be that is infinite as well. □