Exercise 2.5 (Existence of a Riemannian metric)

Proposition 2.4. Every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric.

Exercise 2.5. Use a partition of unity to prove the preceding proposition.

Answers

Proof. Let { ( U α , φ α ) } α A be the smooth structure of M . Each smooth coordinate chart induces a Riemannian metric:

g α : = δ ij d x α i d x α j
(1)

where x α 1 , , x α n denote the local coordinates associated with the local coordinate map φ α . Using a partition of unity { ψ α } α A subordinate to { U α } α A , we define

g : = α A ψ α g α .
(2)

Since { ψ α } α A is a partition of unity, the family of supports { supp ψ α } α A is locally finite, meaning that every point p M has a neighborhood that intersects supp ψ α only for finitely many values of α . In other words, the sum in Eq. (2 ) has only finitely many non-zero elements at each point p M . Therefore, g is

(i)
(a smooth tensor field)
Since a linear combination of smooth tensor fields is again a smooth tensor field, g defines a smooth tensor field (LeeSM, p257).
(ii)
(symmetric)
Since a linear combination of symmetric tensors is again a symmetric tensor, g is symmetric:
g | p ( v , w ) = α A ψ α g α | p ( v , w ) = α A ψ α g α | p ( w , v ) = g | p ( w , v ) .
(iii)
(positive definite)
Let v T p M be any nonzero vector. We have
g | p ( v , v ) = α A ψ α g α | p ( v , v ) .

Each term in this sum is nonnegative since ψ α 0 and g α | p ( v , v ) > 0 ; thus, g ( v , v ) is nonnegative as well. But at least one of the functions ψ α is strictly positive at p (otherwise it would not sum up to 1). Thus, g p ( v , v ) must be positive as well. Whenever v = 0 , the assertion follows easily.

Following a similar strategy by pulling back a Lorentzian metric via charts, the argument in (iii) for non-degeneracy would not be necessarily satisfied. This is because it is not generally true that a linear combination of nondegenerate 2-tensors with positive coefficients is necessarily nondegenerate.

User profile picture
2023-10-30 10:45
Comments