Exercise 1.3.7

Question

% Custom definitions (IntroToSetTheory)
% Source section: sec_1_3.tex

% Common sets
\def
ats{{\boldsymbol{N}}}
\def\ints{{\boldsymbol{Z}}}
\defats{{\boldsymbol{Q}}}
\def\prats{ats^+}
\defeals{{\boldsymbol{R}}}
\def\es{\varnothing}

% Common variables/symbols
\def\vphi{\varphi}
\def\a{\alpha}
\def\b{\beta}
\def\g{\gamma}
\def\d{\delta}
\def\e{\varepsilon}
\def\z{\zeta}
\def\k{\kappa}
\def\l{\lambda}
\def
{
u}
\def{ho}
\def\s{\sigma}
\def	{	au}
\def\x{\xi}
\def\w{\omega}
\def\W{\Omega}
\def\al{\aleph}

% Logic
\def\bic{\leftrightarrow}

ewcommand{\propP}[1]{\prop{P}(#1)}
\def\lxor{\veebar}

% For set-buider notation
\def\where{\mid}

% Other stuff
\def\dom{\mathrm{dom}\,}
\defan{\mathrm{ran}\,}

% Cardinality shortcuts
\def\cnats{{\al_0}}
\def\ccont{{2^\cnats}}

% Equivalence classes

ewcommand\eclass[2]{\squares{#1}_{#2}}

% Shortcuts that make writing easier

ewcommand\parens[1]{\left( #1 ight)}

ewcommand\squares[1]{\left[ #1 ight]}

ewcommand\braces[1]{\left\{ #1 ight\}}

ewcommand\angles[1]{\left\langle #1 ightangle}

ewcommand\ceil[1]{\left\lceil #1 ightceil}

ewcommand\floor[1]{\left\lfloor #1 ightfloor}

ewcommand\abs[1]{\left| #1 ight|}

ewcommand\dabs[1]{\left\| #1 ight\|}

ewcommand\vect[1]{\mathrm{\mathbf{#1}}}

ewcommand\conj[1]{\overline{#1}}

ewcommand\pset[1]{\mathcal{P}\left(#1ight)}

ewcommand\inv[1]{#1^{-1}}

ewcommand\prop[1]{\mathbf{#1}}
\defest{estriction}

ewcommand	et[2]{{^{#1}#2}}

% Families of set
\def\famF{\mathcal{F}}

% These are needed so that half-open intervals do not cause auto-indentation issues due to unmatched brackets

ewcommand\clop[1]{[#1)}

ewcommand\ilab[1]{#1)}

% Other miscellaneous stuff
\def\ss{\subseteq}
\def\pss{\subset}
\def\Seq{\mathrm{Seq}}
\def\prece{\preccurlyeq}
\def\sd{\bigtriangleup}

% Environment shortcuts

ewcommand\gath[1]{\begin{gather*} #1 \end{gather*}}

ewcommand\ali[1]{\begin{align*} #1 \end{align*}}

ewcommand\qproof[1]{\begin{proof} #1 \end{proof}}

ewcommand\bicproof[2]{
  $(	o)$ #1

$(\leftarrow)$ #2
}

ewcommand\seteqproof[2]{
  $(\ss)$ #1

$(\supseteq)$ #2
}

% Environment for indenting nested paragraphs (useful in case trees)

ewenvironment{indpar}
{
  \begin{adjustwidth}{1cm}{}
    }{
  \end{adjustwidth}
}

% Exercise, Theorem, and solution shortcuts

ewcommand\exercise[2]{{
      enewcommand\label[1]{} % Needed to suppress multiply-defined label warning since the same question numbers are used in different sections
      \setcounter{subsubsection}{#1-1} % Subsubsections are used to that lemmas have the full nested numbering
      \stepcounter{subsubsection} % Need to increment this so that the lemma counter gets reset
      \setcounter{question}{#1-1} % Manually set the question number since we always know the exercise number
      \question{#2} % The actual exam class question
    }}

ewcommand\exerciseapp[3]{
  \setqf{#2}
  \exercise{#1}{#3}
  \setqf{}
}

ewcommand	heorem[2]{{
      enewcommand\label[1]{} % Needed to suppress multiply-defined label warning since the same question numbers are used in different sections
      \setcounter{subsubsection}{#1-1} % Subsubsections are used to that lemmas have the full nested numbering
      \stepcounter{subsubsection} % Need to increment this so that the lemma counter gets reset
      \setcounter{question}{#1-1} % Manually set the question number since we always know the theorem number
      \question{#2} % The actual exam class question
    }}

ewcommand	heoremapp[3]{
  \setqf{#2}
  	heorem{#1}{#3}
  \setqf{}
}

ewcommand\sol[1]{
  \begin{solution}

#1
  \end{solution}
}

% Main problem and theorem labels
\def\mainprob{	extbf{Main Problem.}}
\def\mainthrm{	extbf{Main Theorem.}}

% Saves some typing
\def\cbthrm{Cantor-Bernstein Theorem}

% Book title
\def\booktitle{
  Introduction to Set Theory \
  Third Edition, Revised and Expanded \
  by Karel Hrbacek and Thomas Jech
}

% Environment aliases used in the source sections

ewenvironment{lem}{\begin{lemma}}{\end{lemma}}

ewenvironment{defin}{\begin{definition}}{\end{definition}}

ewenvironment{cor}{\begin{corollary}}{\end{corollary}}

ewenvironment{thrm}{\begin{theorem}}{\end{theorem}}

% Override indpar to avoid changepage/adjustwidth dependency
enewenvironment{indpar}{\begin{quote}}{\end{quote}}

% Section-local definitions
\def\axcomp{Axiom Schema of Comprehension}
The Axiom of Pair, the Axiom of Union, and the Axiom of Power Set can be replaced by the following weaker versions.

Weak Axiom of Pair: For any $A$ and $B$, there is a set $C$ such that $A \in C$ and $B \in C$.

Weak Axiom of Union: For any $S$, there exists $U$ such that if $X \in A$ and $A \in S$, then $X \in U$.

Weak Axiom of Power Set: For any set $S$, there exists $P$ such that $X \ss S$ implies $X \in P$.

Prove the Axiom of Pair, the Axiom of Union, and the Axiom of Power Set using these weaker versions.
		[Hint: Use also the Comprehension Schema.]

Dan Whitman · Accepted Answer

% Custom definitions (IntroToSetTheory)
% Source section: sec_1_3.tex

% Common sets
\def
ats{{\boldsymbol{N}}}
\def\ints{{\boldsymbol{Z}}}
\defats{{\boldsymbol{Q}}}
\def\prats{ats^+}
\defeals{{\boldsymbol{R}}}
\def\es{\varnothing}

% Common variables/symbols
\def\vphi{\varphi}
\def\a{\alpha}
\def\b{\beta}
\def\g{\gamma}
\def\d{\delta}
\def\e{\varepsilon}
\def\z{\zeta}
\def\k{\kappa}
\def\l{\lambda}
\def
{
u}
\def{ho}
\def\s{\sigma}
\def	{	au}
\def\x{\xi}
\def\w{\omega}
\def\W{\Omega}
\def\al{\aleph}

% Logic
\def\bic{\leftrightarrow}

ewcommand{\propP}[1]{\prop{P}(#1)}
\def\lxor{\veebar}

% For set-buider notation
\def\where{\mid}

% Other stuff
\def\dom{\mathrm{dom}\,}
\defan{\mathrm{ran}\,}

% Cardinality shortcuts
\def\cnats{{\al_0}}
\def\ccont{{2^\cnats}}

% Equivalence classes

ewcommand\eclass[2]{\squares{#1}_{#2}}

% Shortcuts that make writing easier

ewcommand\parens[1]{\left( #1 ight)}

ewcommand\squares[1]{\left[ #1 ight]}

ewcommand\braces[1]{\left\{ #1 ight\}}

ewcommand\angles[1]{\left\langle #1 ightangle}

ewcommand\ceil[1]{\left\lceil #1 ightceil}

ewcommand\floor[1]{\left\lfloor #1 ightfloor}

ewcommand\abs[1]{\left| #1 ight|}

ewcommand\dabs[1]{\left\| #1 ight\|}

ewcommand\vect[1]{\mathrm{\mathbf{#1}}}

ewcommand\conj[1]{\overline{#1}}

ewcommand\pset[1]{\mathcal{P}\left(#1ight)}

ewcommand\inv[1]{#1^{-1}}

ewcommand\prop[1]{\mathbf{#1}}
\defest{estriction}

ewcommand	et[2]{{^{#1}#2}}

% Families of set
\def\famF{\mathcal{F}}

% These are needed so that half-open intervals do not cause auto-indentation issues due to unmatched brackets

ewcommand\clop[1]{[#1)}

ewcommand\ilab[1]{#1)}

% Other miscellaneous stuff
\def\ss{\subseteq}
\def\pss{\subset}
\def\Seq{\mathrm{Seq}}
\def\prece{\preccurlyeq}
\def\sd{\bigtriangleup}

% Environment shortcuts

ewcommand\gath[1]{\begin{gather*} #1 \end{gather*}}

ewcommand\ali[1]{\begin{align*} #1 \end{align*}}

ewcommand\qproof[1]{\begin{proof} #1 \end{proof}}

ewcommand\bicproof[2]{
  $(	o)$ #1

$(\leftarrow)$ #2
}

ewcommand\seteqproof[2]{
  $(\ss)$ #1

$(\supseteq)$ #2
}

% Environment for indenting nested paragraphs (useful in case trees)

ewenvironment{indpar}
{
  \begin{adjustwidth}{1cm}{}
    }{
  \end{adjustwidth}
}

% Exercise, Theorem, and solution shortcuts

ewcommand\exercise[2]{{
      enewcommand\label[1]{} % Needed to suppress multiply-defined label warning since the same question numbers are used in different sections
      \setcounter{subsubsection}{#1-1} % Subsubsections are used to that lemmas have the full nested numbering
      \stepcounter{subsubsection} % Need to increment this so that the lemma counter gets reset
      \setcounter{question}{#1-1} % Manually set the question number since we always know the exercise number
      \question{#2} % The actual exam class question
    }}

ewcommand\exerciseapp[3]{
  \setqf{#2}
  \exercise{#1}{#3}
  \setqf{}
}

ewcommand	heorem[2]{{
      enewcommand\label[1]{} % Needed to suppress multiply-defined label warning since the same question numbers are used in different sections
      \setcounter{subsubsection}{#1-1} % Subsubsections are used to that lemmas have the full nested numbering
      \stepcounter{subsubsection} % Need to increment this so that the lemma counter gets reset
      \setcounter{question}{#1-1} % Manually set the question number since we always know the theorem number
      \question{#2} % The actual exam class question
    }}

ewcommand	heoremapp[3]{
  \setqf{#2}
  	heorem{#1}{#3}
  \setqf{}
}

ewcommand\sol[1]{
  \begin{solution}

#1
  \end{solution}
}

% Main problem and theorem labels
\def\mainprob{	extbf{Main Problem.}}
\def\mainthrm{	extbf{Main Theorem.}}

% Saves some typing
\def\cbthrm{Cantor-Bernstein Theorem}

% Book title
\def\booktitle{
  Introduction to Set Theory \
  Third Edition, Revised and Expanded \
  by Karel Hrbacek and Thomas Jech
}

% Environment aliases used in the source sections

ewenvironment{lem}{\begin{lemma}}{\end{lemma}}

ewenvironment{defin}{\begin{definition}}{\end{definition}}

ewenvironment{cor}{\begin{corollary}}{\end{corollary}}

ewenvironment{thrm}{\begin{theorem}}{\end{theorem}}

% Override indpar to avoid changepage/adjustwidth dependency
enewenvironment{indpar}{\begin{quote}}{\end{quote}}

% Section-local definitions
\def\axcomp{Axiom Schema of Comprehension}
All the below proofs follow the same basic structure:
	\begin{enumerate}
		\item Establish a property $\propP{x}$ that exactly matches the defining property of the set guaranteed to exist by the normal axiom.
		\item Instantiate the set $C$ that exists by the weak form of the axiom.
		\item Show that $\propP{x} 	o x \in C$ for all $x$.
		\item This proves that the set $\braces{x \where \propP{x}}$ exists by the \axcomp{}, which is exactly the set asserted to exist by the normal axiom.
	\end{enumerate}

The Axiom of Pair
	\qproof {
		Suppose that $A$ and $B$ are sets and define the property $\propP{x}$ by $x = A$ or $x = B$.
		Now let $C$ be a set guaranteed to exist by the Weak Axiom of Pair such that $A \in C$ and $B \in C$.
		Now suppose that $\propP{x}$ holds for $x$, hence $x = A$ or $x = B$.
		If $x = A$ then $x \in C$ since $A \in C$.
		Similarly, in the other case in which $x = B$ then also $x \in C$ since $B \in C$.
		Hence, in both cases $x \in C$ so that $\propP{x}$ implies that $x \in C$.
		Therefore, the set $P = \braces{x \where \propP{x}}$ = $\braces{x \in C \where \propP{x}}$ exists by the \axcomp{}.
		Of course $P$ is exactly the set guaranteed to exist by the (normal) Axiom of Pair, proving the result.
	}

The Axiom of Union
	\qproof{
		Let $S$ be any set and define the property $\propP{x}$ as $x \in A$ for some $A \in S$.
		Now let $C$ be a set guaranteed to exist by the Weak Axiom of Union so that, for every $A \in S$, $x \in A$ implies that $x \in C$ also.
		Suppose that $\propP{x}$ holds for $x$ so that there is a particular $A \in S$ such that $x \in A$.
		Then, since $A \in S$ and $x \in A$, it follows from the Weak Axiom of Union that $x \in C$.
		Hence, we have established that $\propP{x}$ implies that $x \in C$.
		Therefore, by the \axcomp{}, the set $\braces{x \where \propP{X}} = \braces{x \in C \where \propP{x}}$ exists, which is exactly the set guaranteed to exist by the (normal) Axiom of Union.
	}

The Axiom of Power Set
	\qproof{
		Let $S$ be any set and define the property $\propP{X}$ by $X \ss S$.
		Now let $C$ be a set that exists by the Weak Axiom of Power Set so that $X \ss S$ implies that $X \in C$ for all $X$.
		Next, suppose that $\propP{X}$ holds for $X$ so that $X \ss S$.
		Then, by the above, we have that $X \in C$ so that clearly $\propP{X}$ implies that $X \in C$.
		Then the set $P = \braces{X \where \propP{X}} = \braces{X \in C \where \propP{X}}$ exists by the \axcomp{}.
		Of course $P$ is exactly the set guaranteed to exist be the (normal) Axiom of Power Set, proving our result.
	}

Exercise 1.3.7

Answers

Comments

Exercise 1.3.7

Answers

Comments

Add answer