Homepage › Solution manuals › Karel Hrbáček › Introduction to Set Theory › Exercise 8.1.10
Exercise 8.1.10
Let be a linearly ordered set. A sequence of elements of is decreasing if for all . Prove that is a well-ordering if and only if there exists no infinite decreasing sequence in .
Answers
Proof. We show the contrapositive of this implication. So suppose that there is a decreasing sequence in , and let be the range of the sequence so that clearly and . Now consider any so that there is a such that . We then have that since the sequence is decreasing, noting that clearly . Since was arbitrary this shows that has no least element (since we have shown that and this is logically equivalent to , noting that is equivalent to since the ordering is linear). Thus, since there is a nonempty subset of that has no least element, it follows that is not a well-ordering.
We show the contrapositive of this implication as well. So suppose that is not a well-ordering. Then there exists a nonempty subset of such that has no least element. By the Axiom of Choice the set has a choice function . For any we define the set .
First we claim that for any . Suppose to the contrary that there is some such that . Consider any other . Then it cannot be that for then so that . So, since the ordering is linear, it has to be that . But, since was arbitrary, this would mean that is the least element of , which we know cannot be since has no least element! Therefore it has to be that indeed for any .
Now we construct a sequence by recursion:
noting that the recursive step is always valid since is never empty, as was just shown. It is easy to see that this is a decreasing sequence. Take any so that we have that . Hence since is a choice function. By the definition of it then follows that , which shows that the sequence is decreasing since was arbitrary. Hence we have constructed an infinite decreasing sequence in . □