Homepage › Solution manuals › Karel Hrbáček › Introduction to Set Theory › Exercise 8.2.8
Exercise 8.2.8
For let if is finite, if is infinite. is a -additive measure on ; it is called the counting measure on .
Answers
Proof. Let , which we know is the largest -algebra of subsets of . We must show that as defined above satisfies the properties of -additive measure on :
For i) we have that since is finite. If is finite then since is nonempty. If is infinite then as well so that in either case as desired.
To show ii) suppose that is a collection of disjoint sets in .
Case: There is an where is infinite. Then obviously by definition. We also clearly have that is infinite since , and hence . Then
since for every . Therefore as desired.
Case: is finite for every . Clearly then for every natural . First, if there is a natural such that for all , then clearly , i.e. the union is finite. It then follows that is finite by Theorem 4.2.7 so that . Then, since the sets are mutually disjoint, we have
by the definition of cardinal addition, noting that clearly the last step follows from the fact that for all .
On the other hand, if there is no such , then it follows that, for every , there is a natural such that . At this point we need two facts from real analysis, supposing that is a real sequence:
- 1.
- By definition, the sequence converges to a real if, for every real , there is an such that for every natural .
- 2.
- If the infinite series converges (to a finite value) then the sequence itself must converge to zero.
We shall show that diverges by showing that the sequence does not converge to zero (i.e. the contrapositive of 2). So let , noting that clearly . Then consider any natural so that there is a natural such that . It then follows that, since is finite but nonempty, . Therefore we have shown
which shows by definition that does not converge to zero. Hence diverges so that by convention .
Lastly, we show that must be infinite. Suppose to the contrary that is finite. We then construct a function as follows: for each there is a unique where . Clearly such an exists since , and it is unique because the sets are mutually disjoint (if it was not unique then there would be distinct and where and so that ). We then simply set .
It then follows from Theorem 4.2.5 that is finite since is. Since is then a finite set of natural numbers, it has greatest natural number . But we know that there is an such that so that there is an . It then follows that clearly and that . However, then would be in so that since is the greatest element of . But we already know that , which is a contradiction. So it has to be that is in fact infinite as desired.
We therefore have and hence ii) has been shown in every case and sub-case so that is indeed a -additive measure on by definition. □