Exercise 10.17

Show that for each m > 0 and finite field F q there is a form of degree m in m variables with no nontrivial zero. [Hint: Let ω 1 , ω 2 , … , ω m be a basis for F q m over F q and show that f ( x 1 , x 2 , … , x m ) = ∏ ⁡ i = 0 m − 1 ( ω 1 q i x 1 + ⋯ + ω m q i x m ) has the required properties.]

Answers

Proof. Let ω 1 , ω 2 , … , ω m be a basis for F q m over F q .

Consider

f ( x 1 , … , x m ) = ∏ i = 0 m − 1 ( ω 1 q i x 1 + ⋯ + ω m q i x m ) .

Then f is a form of degree m in m variables.

By definition, f ∈ 𝔽 q m ( x 1 , … , x m ) . We show first that f ∈ 𝔽 q [ x 1 , … , x m ] .

Let f be the Frobenius automorphism on 𝔽 q m , defined by

F { 𝔽 q m → 𝔽 q m α ↦ α q .

By Corollary 1 of Proposition 7.1.1, for every α ∈ 𝔽 q m , α ∈ 𝔽 q if and only if F ( α ) = α . If p = ∑ ⁡ i = 0 d a i 1 , … , i m x 1 i 1 ⋯ x m i m ∈ 𝔽 q m [ x 1 , … , x m ] , define F ⋅ p = ∑ ⁡ i = 0 d F ( a i 1 , … , i m ) x 1 i 1 ⋯ x m i m . Then F ⋅ p ∈ 𝔽 q m [ x ] ⟺ F ⋅ p = p and F ⋅ ( pq ) = ( F ⋅ p ) ( F ⋅ q ) for all p , q ∈ 𝔽 q m [ x 1 , … , x m ] .

Then, using this last property,

F ⋅ f = ∏ i = 0 m − 1 F ⋅ ( ω 1 q i x 1 + ⋯ + ω m q i x m ) = ∏ i = 0 m − 1 ( ω 1 q i + 1 x 1 + ⋯ + ω m q i + 1 x m ) = ∏ j = 1 m ( ω 1 q j x 1 + ⋯ + ω m q j x m ) ( j = i + 1 ) = ∏ j = 0 m − 1 ( ω 1 q j x 1 + ⋯ + ω m q j x m ) ( since  ω k q m = ω k = ω k q 0 , k = 1 , … , m ) = f .

Therefore f ∈ 𝔽 q [ x 1 , … , x m ] .

Now we prove that f has no non trivial zero a ¯ = ( α 1 , … , α m ) ∈ 𝔽 q m ∖ { ( 0 , … , 0 ) } . If f had such a zero ( α 1 , … , α m ) ∈ 𝔽 q m , then

∏ i = 0 m − 1 ( ω 1 q i α 1 + ⋯ + ω m q i α m ) = 0 , α 1 , … , α m ∈ 𝔽 q .

Then for some i ∈ [[ 0 , m − 1 ]] ,

ω 1 q i α 1 + ⋯ + ω m q i α m = 0 .

Applying F m − i to this equality, and using F ( α i ) = α i , we obtain

ω 1 q m α 1 + ⋯ + ω m q m α m = 0 .

Since ω i q m = ω i , i = 1 , … , m , this gives

ω 1 α 1 + ⋯ + ω m α m = 0 .

Since ω 1 , ω 2 , … , ω m is a basis for F q m over F q , this proves

( α 1 , … , α m ) = ( 0 , … , 0 ) .

So f has no non trivial zero.

Note : this proves that we cannot extend the Chevalley’s Theorem to the forms of degree m in m varibles. □

User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments